Search for: "Does 1 to 10"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 43,745
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2018, 10:27 am
California Labor Code § 1101 prohibits employers from having “any rule, regulation, or policy” (1) forbidding or preventing employees from engaging or participating in politics or running for office; or (2) “controlling or directing, or tending to control or direct the political activities or affiliations of employees. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 5:34 pm
Some receivers have safeguards to prevent or limit this. 1. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 4:58 am
These will be called ISBN-10s and ISBN-13s.Stars Stones Scholars (softcover)# ISBN-10: 1412013445# ISBN-13: 978-1412013444Stars Stones Scholars (hardcover)# ISBN-10: 1412201357# ISBN-13: 978-1412201353ISBN-10 NumbersPrior to January 1, 2007, ISBN numbers had 10 characters.Those are the ISBN-10 numbers.ISBN-13 NumbersBeginning on January 1, 2007, ISBN numbers are 13 characters.Those are the ISBN-13 numbers. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:12 am
Article 129(1) of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) grants preferential treatment to covered bonds collateralized by senior units issued by French Fonds Communs de Titrisation or equivalent securitization entities, securitising residential (point (d)) or commercial (point (f)) property exposures, provided that certain conditions are met: they qualify for credit quality step 1 under the credit risk rules in the CRR; their amount does not exceed 10% of the… [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 2:24 am
1. ansässigen und verstorbenen Auslandsgriechen. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 5:40 am
See Practice Book § 61-10 (b). [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 12:39 pm
Which is uncomfortable because Possibility 1 is a subversion of the rule of law. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 2:31 pm
The Board reasonably concluded that Edmondson does not expressly disclose the 1:1 sitagliptin DHP salt. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 8:44 am
Photo credit: “the words Top 10 in a burst of colorful stars” // ShutterStockI’m pleased to present my annual list of top Internet Law developments from the past year. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 9:03 am
The employer is put on notice by the injured Nevada worker filling out a C-1 form within seven (7) days after the accident. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
II(1), June 10, 1958, 21 U.S.T. 2517, 330 U.N.T.S. 3)). [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 2:30 pm
The post Case preview: When does a statutory “judgment bar” prevent lawsuits against federal officers for constitutional violations? [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:34 am
As stated, even though the Italian Supreme Court did not refer to the jurisprudence of the ECtHR, its conclusion is in line with the approach developed by the latter in connection with Article 8 / Article 10 ECHR situations.Indeed, the ECtHR requires consideration of 5+1 key criteria to determine if Article 10 should prevail over Article 8 protection:The contribution to a debate of public interest;The degree of notoriety of the person affected;The subject of the news… [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 11:52 am
Evangelisto Ramos was convicted of a 2014 murder in New Orleans in state court by a vote of 10 jurors to 2. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 5:44 am
Not everyone does this, and it can help with the case. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 4:58 pm
Section 63-15-230 allows the court to award either joint or sole custody as it sees fit but does not express a preference between either. [read post]
1 May 2015, 11:55 am
However, if the employer has to hire a replacement, and does so, the employer may charge the employee for the entire missed shift. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:08 pm
1. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
In the words of the court, [1] the fact hat some of the new charges concerned alleged misconduct predating the period of dismissal probation is of no moment and [2] the fact that Petitioner's application for disability retirement, which he submitted before pleading guilty to the initial disciplinary charges, was later recommended for approval, "does not demonstrate his termination was in bad faith. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
In the words of the court, [1] the fact hat some of the new charges concerned alleged misconduct predating the period of dismissal probation is of no moment and [2] the fact that Petitioner's application for disability retirement, which he submitted before pleading guilty to the initial disciplinary charges, was later recommended for approval, "does not demonstrate his termination was in bad faith. [read post]
