Search for: "Does 1-29"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 12,791
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2017, 4:57 am
Under point (j) of Article 2(1), MiFID II does not apply to persons dealing on own account or providing investment services in specific cases, including where their activity is an ancillary activity to their main business provided that certain conditions are met. [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:43 am
Shaw, No. 1:11-cr-239-29-CAP-ECS, 2012 WL 844075 (N.D. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 5:49 am
The government initially waived its right to respond to the cert. petition, but the Court has since called for a response, which is due March 29. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 3:28 pm
As the disclaimer in present claim 1 is not directed to the exclusion of a composition as such, it is not based on the application as originally filed. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 3:02 pm
The general definition of “primary duty” is found at 29 C.F.R. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
The new rules are set to take effect January 1, 2012. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:08 am
The EU’s share declined somewhat more, to 29% in 2006, followed closely by Japan. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 8:20 am
The ruling is scheduled to appear online at 1 p.m. eastern time today, and you can access it via this link. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 6:38 pm
May 29, 2008) [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 1:46 pm
CureVac now faces over $1 billion in debt. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 7:09 am
Call now for compensation” [four years ago on Overlawyered; Germany] Tags: amusement parks, Australia, charitable trusts, defense lawyers, Jonathan Lee Riches, Richard Blumenthal, Supreme Court Related posts October 9 roundup (0) May 5 roundup (1) May 18 roundup (5) June 29 roundup (10) January 30 roundup (2) [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 6:22 am
Hamermesh (Widener University), on Thursday, November 29, 2018 Editor's Note: Lawrence A. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 2:02 am
"As for another issue that arose in the proceedings, i.e. whether there has been a violation of Section 293(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 in relation to the transfer of certain projects from another company to RPL, SEBI rightly held that it does not have the mandate to administer provisions of the Companies Act and hence has no jurisdiction to conclude a finding under that section. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:40 pm
However, the company does not want to register as an RMM. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 1:04 pm
This data-sharing requirement does not extend to telephone orders. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 8:55 am
January 29, 2015 The Most Famous Dissent in Canadian Labour Law History Revisited On the eve of the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Saskatchewan v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 5:30 am
App. 29 Mar. 2007) (mem. op.) [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:40 am
July 29, 2011).* The vehicle stop was with probable cause of a traffic infraction, so reasonable suspicion of drug activity does not have to be decided. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 2:44 pm
Following up on the earlier post New SG Unlikely To Alter Fed Gov't's SCOTUS Arguments In Ceded Lands Case, which noted that the new Solicitor General has sought leave from the Supreme Court to participate in oral argument and for divided argument, here's the motion filed by the SG's office on January 29, 2009, which reveals that the Obama Administration does not appear to be materially altering arguments the federal government set forth in the… [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 1:29 am
Gitmo is not behind us – but it does have a past, one that can provide critical perspective on what should happen now. [read post]
