Search for: "Does 1-54"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 3,421
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2011, 6:34 am
Yet standing between the redevelopers and their visions of sugar-condos are the lichen-like economic cryptobiotica of small businesses, who are annoyingly stubborn when it comes to protecting what they see as their property rights, as profiled in No more ‘blight blanket’ eminent domain: Part 1, does this look like blight to you? [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:28 am
The settlement stipulation does not indicate whether or to what extent any of the other defendants are contributing toward the settlement amount. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm
POL’Y 1, 51–57 (2010); Clayton E. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 4:11 am
Smart, 21 M.J. 15, 18-19 and n. 1 (CMA 1985). [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
Paragraph 46 of Circular 1/06 states that in such circumstances local planning authorities are expected to give substantial weight to the unmet need in considering whether temporary planning permission is justified. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
Paragraph 46 of Circular 1/06 states that in such circumstances local planning authorities are expected to give substantial weight to the unmet need in considering whether temporary planning permission is justified. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm
Or you make the disclaimer clear, but then it does not fit the prior art any more, and the disclaimer will not comply with the requirements of G 1/03. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:06 am
Bush's political operative, was involved in early tort “reform”. (06:54) Brendan Scott is a lawyer in Australia, who has published about GPL enforcement and writes a blog about legal issues related to Open Source and Free Software (11:58) Segment 1 (12:50) Bradley talked about 501(c)(3) status and Form 1023s in his interview on FLOSS weekly. (13:50) Around 2010, applications for Free Software non-profits' 501(c)(3) … [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm
By replacing the conventional objective approach by an approach based on the notion of “difficulty” and on the obviousness of the solution, without any relation to the prior art according to A 54(2), the ED has taken a decision that does not allow [the Board] to check whether the analysis of the facts and the conclusions drawn are correct. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 10:32 am
Between the two, they should have provided better, more accurate, and more consistent advice. 1. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:30 am
(See Seanad Eireann Debates, Criminal Procedure Bill 2009: Committee Stage (Resumed), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 vol. 199 no.1 col 52-53.) [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:47 am
” N.J.S.A. 9:3-50(c)(1). [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:08 am
, [1935] 1 D.L.R. 432 (B.C.C.A.). [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
The objection under A 100(a) in combination with A 54 against claim 1 had to be considered a fresh ground for opposition. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 7:56 am
A-1. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:55 pm
Privately held with 400 full-time and 400 part-time employees, Medcor does $54 million in business per year. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:07 am
Does not think there is distinction between exempt advisers and registered advisers with respect to disclosure information on the ADV. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
§ 29-2-205(1)] is a separate matter entirely. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
Although there is only one A 54, there are indeed several concepts of novelty, depending on the technical field that is considered. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
The Board also stated that the rejection of the main request as well as the findings in relation to the first auxiliary request under A 123, A 83 and A 54 were res iudicata. [read post]
