Search for: "Downs v State"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 40,830
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2010, 3:31 am
In a landmark decision in Perry v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 2:15 pm
” (…) Glaser Weil’s argument focused on MDQ, LLC v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 5:28 pm
Triantyfyllos Tafas v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 5:03 pm
See Purcell v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 4:24 pm
On 9 February 2017, the European Court of Human Rights handed down an important judgment in Selmani and Ors v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 10:29 am
Additionally, the Attorney General asserted in the same guidance that the state’s pre-Roe abortion ban, the one that was specifically struck down by The Supreme Court in its 1973 Roe v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 9:21 am
Unlike most CFAA cases, RyanAir DAC v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 8:09 am
The case is National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
12 May 2012, 2:26 pm
State. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:23 am
That’s the lesson of United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 9:23 pm
On Monday, the 9th Circuit handed down its decision in the Wilcox v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 8:07 am
United States, Berghuis v. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 9:38 am
Another Florida appellate court has struck down a state law that restricts the amount of money that can be awarded for pain-and-suffering in a medical malpractice lawsuit that results in injury. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:11 am
About a century ago, Benito Mussolini called fascist Italy a “totalitarian state,” a concept that he defined with brilliant clarity: “Everything in the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 2:08 pm
Ireland ECR [2006] I-4635 (the famous "MOX Plant" case, see our post here) but that case concerned disputes between member States and the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Justice laid down in what is now Article 258 TFEU (ex Article 226 EC) not between investors and States. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 9:14 am
" What struck me initially about United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 6:21 am
The Supreme Court holds that a Minnesota law that prohibits people from wearing political clothing in a polling place violates the First Amendment.The case is Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:14 pm
The petitioners in that case, Elane Photography v. [read post]
26 Nov 2006, 1:14 pm
Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 6:34 pm
Cox in the Fourth Circuit and UMG v. [read post]
