Search for: "I. C. "
Results 2561 - 2580
of 55,228
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2008, 6:50 pm
C'mon, Orin, you don't give us enough credit with your non-Volokh post. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
My name is Mark C. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
Michael C. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:14 am
Exhibit C: I get to class and a friend tells me I have lipstick all over my teeth (Note: I have had 1 conversation with a Starbucks employee and 2 conversations in the elevator....lovely.) [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 9:43 am
Waiver of Inadmissibility for a Nonimmigrant Visa due to prostitution INA 212(d)(3) – Except as provided in this subsection, an alien (i) 20b/ who is applying for a nonimmigrant visa and is known or believed by the consular officer to be ineligible for such visa under subsection (a) (other than paragraphs (3)(A)(i)(I), (3)(A)(ii), (3)(A)(iii), (3)(C), 20a/ and clauses (i) and (ii) of paragraph (3)(E) of such subsection), may, after approval by the… [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 2:15 am
Paragraph 4(c)(i) of the Policy. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 1:01 pm
Mencionaram, ainda, como fundamento, o artigo 21, caput, e parágrafo único da Lei 9.096/95 e o artigo 112, inciso I, do Código Eleitoral. [read post]
26 May 2010, 7:09 am
Bill C-29 amends PIPEDA – I’ll leave commentary on that to David Fraser. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 6:16 pm
(c)375 of 2007). [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:37 pm
Attorney for the District of Columbia Ronald C. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:43 am
I was intrigued by the comment in the recent ReDigi holding to the effect that there were three distinct secondary liability claims in the case: (a) contributory infringement; (b) inducement of infringement; and, (c) vicarious infringement (pp 14-15 of the opinion). [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 6:26 am
If you file Form I-765 for the (c)(9) category, you will be required to pay a fee or submit a fee waiver request . [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 4:14 am
To be pedantic this case concerned the database right, but perhaps it may still be considered as part of the copyright galaxy]; 23 January 2014 - Case C-355/12 Nintendo [here and here]; 13 February 2014 - Case C-466/12 Svensson [here, here and here]; 27 February 2014 - Case C-351/12 OSA [here]; 27 March 2014 - Case C-314/12 Telekabel [here]; 3 April 2014 - Case… [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:07 pm
C. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 5:37 am
No có? [read post]
23 May 2007, 4:01 am
c. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 2:58 pm
As I catch up on the labour and employment events that took place while I was away, I saw that the Supreme Court of Canada granted leave to appeal in two important decisions Plourde c. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:08 am
I am a landlord. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 10:26 am
I sometimes wonder why they don't go the whole way. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 11:40 am
Second, in assessing the legality of State C’s conduct in connection with the injured State’s countermeasures, we consider whether State C has an entitlement in its own right to take a countermeasure in response to the wrongdoing State’s initial breach: (i) State C would have such an entitlement if the obligation breached by the wrongdoing State was owed erga omnes or erga omnes partes, including to State C. [read post]
