Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 2561 - 2580
of 18,400
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2022, 5:12 am
Which they won’t do because they’re gods. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:12 pm
After two new justices were confirmed, the court ordered re-argument, so Weddington again took the lectern in October 1972. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
In Fulton v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
She predicted that other states would follow suit, not necessarily because of what Arizona had done, but because chief justices and regulators in other states were already thinking about implementing reforms in order to address the growing gap in access to justice. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
She predicted that other states would follow suit, not necessarily because of what Arizona had done, but because chief justices and regulators in other states were already thinking about implementing reforms in order to address the growing gap in access to justice. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
"] From Justice Christine Donohue's majority opinion (joined by Chief Justice Max Baer and Justices Thomas Saylor and David Wecht) in In the Interest of Y.W. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 3:32 pm
Where this comes up most frequently if you’re in a divorce, is that Texas requires children born of the marriage to be addressed in a divorce. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 2:26 pm
As explained in the case for which it is named, People v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 9:12 pm
O.L.C. __, at *6 (citing Whitman v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 2:19 pm
Basically, if the police officer did something wrong -- here, entered a house without a warrant -- but the wrong was okay under then-existing precedent, we're cool with it. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 6:01 am
" Brinsdon v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 4:37 am
I am especially delighted to blog about Estate of Connie Collins v. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 8:16 pm
Justice Rehnquist wrote a separate concurrence explaining that the false claims act also requires FCA penalties for making false statements in violation of 31 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 7:01 pm
Justice Dunphy recently released a decision in TSCC 2204 v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm
Institute for Justice (2011): Your summarist is asked by his boss for an opinion on the then-recently-filed case Kerr v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 11:59 am
Haier decisions by the Federal Court of Justice of Germany. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
While the states were seen as “laboratories of democracy” by Justice Brandeis in New State Ice Company v Liebmann – in recent years states have become “laboratories of national partisan politics,” to adopt Jessica Bulman-Pozen’s gloss on Brandeis. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 4:38 pm
The matter came on as an expedited hearing on 4 November 2021, before Dame Victoria Sharp, Lady Justice King and Lord Justice Warby. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 2:44 pm
But Bridges is predicting that the Supreme Court will in fact act hypocritically on gun rights: “We have six justices, and it’s looking more like five these days, who like gun rights and don’t like abortion rights…They’re willing to disregard some precedent while venerating other precedent. [read post]
