Search for: "In re E.G." Results 2561 - 2580 of 13,882
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2016, 3:05 am
In re LSB Group LLC, Serial No. 86510189 (November 30, 2016) [not precedential].Applicant relied on 28 third-party registrations for LUCKY-containing marks, including LUCKY BEAVER BAR & BURGER, LUCKY'S LOUNGE [in Boston, near WGS], and LUCKY NOODLES. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 4:26 am by Jon Hyman
In fact, an employer’s obligations to an employee harassed by a non-employee are exactly the same as if the alleged perpetrator was an employee—to take prompt remedial action to ensure that the harassment stops and does not re-occur. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 5:06 am
FCC, 512 U.S. 622 (1994) and 520 U.S. 180 (1997)) impose non-discrimination and compulsory carriage on companies that might elsewhere have some First Amendment rights, e.g., how to package and tier content. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 10:20 pm
Please be aware that LBG require a minimum of 48 hours for funds to be re-released once returned, please consider if the initial completion dates are viable before submitting your COT.Solicitors should carefully check the lender handbook for what account to return funds to, we are seeing an increased number of scenarios where they are sending funds to the wrong place (e.g. sending to old A/ account which is now closed, sending 60/ funds back to the 2002 account details), please… [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 2:02 am by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
While the current rules provide that “[t]he Director may require additional information where there is a question whether the delay was ‘unintentional’” (see, e.g., 37 CFR § 1.137(b)(4)), the USPTO rarely does so. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 3:31 am
" In re Rodeowave Entertainment, LLC, Serial No. 87801076 (November 13, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christen M. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 3:12 am
In re Elephant Learning, LLC, Serial No. 90556090 (July 13, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cindy B. [read post]
19 May 2021, 3:16 am
" In re Wenger S.A., Serial No. 85157939 (May 14, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 2:15 pm
 About a week ago, one of the DNC emails told me this about employer-sponsored medical insurance: “Today, the Trump administration announced that they're rolling back a mandate requiring employer-provided health insurance to cover contraception -- a rule that has helped at least 55 million women across the country access care. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 8:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  Consumers have complained, e.g., “what’s said is deceptive, very deceptive in fact...It’s still hogwash though and deceptive...because what you’re really doing is selling younger whisky while pretending it’s older. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 2:40 pm
  You're saying that just because the County put the money that belonged to the plaintiff into a "trust" account doesn't mean that there was actually a "trust" (e.g., fiduciary) relationship between the parties. [read post]
8 May 2019, 12:09 pm
  So, they say, they're entitled to compensation.I'm somewhat sympathetic to this position, at least as a purely legal matter. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:54 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
A statutorygrant of a procedural right, e.g., right to appeal, doesnot eliminate the requirements of Article III. [read post]
27 May 2021, 3:47 am
In re Yodeets Digital, LLC, Serial No. 88977161 (May 21, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christen M. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 2:59 am
.'" In re The Crosby Group LLC, Serial No. 86780353 (April 17, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Heasley).The Marks: The Board found the word CROSBY to be the dominant element in applicant's mark. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 5:54 am by Jon Hyman
To ensure that you do not miss any updates in your reader, please take a moment and re-subscribe to the new feed address (if you have not already done so): http://www.ohioemployerlawblog.com/feeds/posts/default  Related StoriesShould employers be liable for conduct they cannot control? [read post]