Search for: "Line v. Line" Results 2561 - 2580 of 45,548
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2009, 7:21 am
The Court has released the opinion in Van de Kamp v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 7:47 am
In People v Ryan (__ NY3d __, 2009 NY Slip Op 01068 [2/12/09]) the Court of Appeals resolved a tension that has existed in the law between two lines of decisions from the Court of Appeals as to the authority of the police to detain a suspect while investigating a crime.Although it is clear that police may not forcibly seize a person without probable cause (to support an arrest) or reasonable suspicion (to support a forcible stop); the fruits of an unlawful seizure must be… [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 3:15 pm by Lawrence Solum
We first consider possible analogies between NFIB and two other famous cases whose opinions are held out as deftly straddling the line between principle and prudence: Marbury v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:42 am
Two years ago an appellate judge upheld the bar to recovery:"Without such a bright-line requirement, the concept of 'marital-type' relationship is unacceptably vulnerable to duplicitous manipulation," Judge Jose Fuentes wrote in Levine v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 2:23 am
"   In addition, this issue includes commentaries on an array of topics and a "Term Paper" by Professor Heidi Hurd, titled "Death to Rapists: A Comment on Kennedy v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 1:06 pm
  Take the recent case  of  Klopfenstein v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 11:01 am by Sean Rohtla
If he is not confirmed by the Senate and steps down, the next in line for the position is Justice Secretary Wanda Vázquez who has previously stated that she has no interest in the office of Governor. [read post]
Dialogue in the oral argument as well as statements in the Court’s opinion suggest this line of reasoning, which arguably originated in Bilski, has become an accepted principal . . . [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 3:30 am by Joseph Robinson
” The Court also held that the doctrine of claim differentiation was applicable here, since the “two severable score lines” limitation only appeared in a dependent claim but not in any independent claims. [read post]