Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2015, 7:23 am
Sinai Hospital v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
It lays down the fundamental structure and essential values of the state. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 6:51 am
”); Lord v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 6:51 am
”); Lord v. [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 7:09 am
Continental v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 10:00 am
| Google Books legal saga ends | s52 CPDA repeal comes into force 28 July 2016 | The latest Jack Wills v House of Fraser judgment [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:41 am
Hicks challenged the finding that the question as to whether lack of ornamentation could be a feature of a design was not central to the case and, in any event, unarguable.Paragraph 50 of the judgment was highlighted in which Lord Neuberger first states that there are powerful arguments against the conclusion that lack of ornamentation was a feature of the Trunki CRD and then appears to consider the initial Trunki product and subsequently registered designs as supporting lack of… [read post]
5 May 2019, 9:10 am
” Sansone v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
A speech by the PCC’s chair Lord Hunt to the PPA conference is available here. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:22 pm
For example, in Giorgi Nikolaishvili v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 7:08 am
Perry and others and then simply states a conclusion. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 11:39 am
Lord Hoffman has in fact stated that the legislative reforms have served to “free the Courts from technical considerations of legal right and to confer a wide power (to do what is fair)…” – O’Neill v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
Wilkins and United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 10:11 am
Of course, a state legislature may dictate the terms in which the duress defense may be raised. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 7:51 am
Reasons for judgement were released today (Mainstream Canada v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 1:58 pm
The Court of Appeal found that there was sufficient unclarity and range of views in the medical evidence that the question the recorder should have addressed himself to was whether the review officer’s decision was Wednesbury unreasonable: Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 K.B. 223, per Lord Greene MR in particular at 233- 4. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 10:39 am
It would be an undesirable state of affairs if Swindon lost the power to take action against Mr Redpath merely because he had been evicted. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 12:46 am
Two interesting speeches by Supreme Court judges, Lord Neuberger: Towards a European Law and Lord Hope: Sovereignty in Question. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
In light of the wording used by Lord Neuberger, PCCM was effectively trying to obtain a similar monopoly without registration, relying on its repute among UK residents. [read post]
