Search for: "Lowe v. United States"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 4,753
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2015, 5:44 am
United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1352 (11th Cir.1982) (“Recognizing that there are often great inequalities in bargaining power between employers and employees, Congress made the FLSA’s provisions mandatory. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 2:30 am
Be that as it may, here's Tim's take on what Arnold J's decision has achieved, how they go about dealing with the same phenomenon in the United States -- and where we might go from here:Richemont v BskyB and others: a national solution to a global problem? [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 3:02 pm
As a result, the uncertainty regarding the Court’s jurisdiction could well persist and perhaps intensify, an unfortunate outcome for the parties, the Court, and the millions of low income families relying on the tax subsidies in order to afford health insurance.Rob Weiner, formerly Associate Deputy Attorney General in the United States Department of Justice, is a partner at Arnold & Porter LLP. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 7:52 am
Wyndham v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am
The challenges, however, hit their own high water mark when the Supreme Court granted review in King v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 6:48 pm
” She also stated that coworkers mocked her accent and said they hated Dominicans. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:21 pm
United States, 469 F.3d 993, 1000(Fed. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 8:38 pm
In Zavalin v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 7:42 am
RFA Brands, LLC v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:11 am
That’s the conclusion of the United States Court of Appeals in upholding the FTC’s ruling. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm
The United States Department of Justice has decided that the company will not face charges. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 11:28 am
Now, county isn't the best unit for this study. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 3:08 am
Hodges v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 10:00 pm
Hodges v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 10:00 pm
Hodges v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 1:00 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:43 am
Turning to the issue of likelihood of consumer confusion, the Ninth Circuit stated that it had to use the factors from AMF, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
Jeremy Sheff: a little dubious of the low numbers here. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:11 am
In Massachusetts, for example, our state high court ruled in Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 7:44 am
That's the question which was answered in the Sixth Circuit's United States v. [read post]
