Search for: "Park v. State"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 11,108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2010, 9:09 am
Law Lessons from HONG JUN CHEN V. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 1:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 7:49 am
Park, J.D. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 6:05 am
Claiming exempt volunteer firefighter status for the purposes of Civil Service Law §75.1(b)Serviss v Incorporated Vil. of Floral Park, 2018 NY Slip Op 05597, Appellate Division, Second Department§75.1 of the Civil Service Laws generally bars the termination of a tenured officer or employee in the Competitive Class of Classified Service of the State or a political subdivision of the State "except for incompetency or misconduct shown after a hearing… [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 10:03 am
Rosa & Raymond Parks Inst. for Self Development v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 4:44 am
State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 6:43 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:32 pm
In some ways the case reflects the problem posed by Parkes QC in Hodges v Naish. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 5:30 am
In Pimentel v. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 6:29 am
State, 2009 Ind. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:49 pm
Titan Insurance Co., No. 136905; and Woodward Parking Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:50 am
Placzek v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 11:40 am
The Plaintiff Suffers a Fall While Rollerblading in the Park The plaintiffs in the case of Frith v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Courts must defer to an agency's interpretation of its own regulations in its area of expertiseAbramoski v New York State Educ. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
In today’s case (Han v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 8:35 am
State Air Resources Board (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th. 681. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:26 pm
(Navajo and Hopi Indian Land Settlement Act of 1974)United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 12:21 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 1:15 pm
That’s not a crime under North Carolina law, the North Carolina Court of Appeals held today in State v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 10:29 pm
On July 7th 2011, the grand chamber of the Court stated again in its judgment Al-Skeini and others v. [read post]