Search for: "People v. English"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 2,926
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2023, 5:42 pm
The FTC asked OpenAI to provide detailed descriptions of all complaints it had received of products making “false, misleading, disparaging or harmful” statements about people. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
The English government (among others) continues to require such retention, going so far as to adopt updated rules, though this has been controversial. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 8:36 am
Housing is what makes places into cities, because cities are where people live in close proximity, and when the people move to the city faster than the city is willing to cope with them, the result is an explosion of informality and slums. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm
Steel Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am
In Nicastro, the defendant was an English manufacturer of metal shearing machines, which were made in England. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:33 am
In Thornton v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am
This is the text of a Keynote address given by Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division at the Law Society’s Family Law Annual Conference ‘The sacred and the secular: religion, culture and the family courts’ on London 29 October 2013 (H/t to Adam Wagner) Only a little over a century ago, in 1905, a judge in a family case could confidently opine that the function of the judges was “to promote virtue and morality and to discourage… [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
The object remains the same, inflaming passions, or in the drier language of the administrator of the engagement of the (voting or focus group relevant) masses might say, to lead people to an appropriate understanding of events and their implications. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 7:27 am
V. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:30 am
Frank Pommersheim, does not speak or understand English. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 7:34 am
V. [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:00 am
” Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:50 am
Hamdi v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:03 pm
It is, of course, true that, after the horrors of the 1914-18 conflagration, many people wanted simply to avoid another war at all costs. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:36 am
Many were surprised that the former Bush v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 1:07 pm
It has over 100,000 English words and associations. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 3:29 am
This flies in the face of all the other areas of judicial endeavour where children are involved; there is nothing in modern life, where mass movements of people, be they refugees, economic migrants, or simply warring families, that dictates that the restoration of a child to “familiar” surroundings is a good thing in its own right. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 7:42 am
In Lee v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:06 am
"(para 131)And for what it is worth, a roughly similar finding was reached, albeit obiter and with an admission of some possibility of doubt , in the recent English libel case of Metropolitan v Designtechnica, where Eady J opined: "it would appear on balance that the provisions of the 2002 Regulations [defining an ISSP] are apt to cover those providing search engine services. [read post]
