Search for: "State v. J. P." Results 2561 - 2580 of 4,861
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2012, 11:55 am by Schachtman
In fact, the EPA Risk Assessment stated, ‘Throughout this chapter, one-tailed tests of significance (p = 0.05) are used …’ . [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 7:54 am by Nicole Mazzocco
    The Dart Properties panel stated that venue should have been proper in Macomb County under MCL 600.1641(2). [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
Take a deep breath, it's a long one...NEWSInformation obtained under mutual legal assistance provisions cannot be disclosed in financial remedy proceedingsThe Home secretary and the Crown Prosecution Service have won their appeal against Moylan J's decision in P v P [2012] EWHC 1733 (Fam). [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 4:35 am by TJ McIntyre
The deferential standard is that applied by Keane C.J. in Orange v The Director of Telecommunications Regulation & Anor and not that in The State (Keegan) v Stardust Compensation Tribunal. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:27 am by legalinformatics
Miller, Penn State University: Rhetoric and Judicial Activism: The Case of Hillary Goodridge v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:52 am by Orbit Law
The applicant must be in one of the following categories at time of enlistment a. asylee, refugee, Temporary Protected Status (TPS), or b. nonimmigrant categories E, F, H, I, J, K, L, M, O, P, Q, R, S, T, TC, TD, TN, U, or V 2. [read post]