Search for: "(I) Moore" Results 241 - 260 of 6,060
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2023, 10:15 am by Judge Paul Michel (Ret.)
Anyone reading this by now knows of the current situation with Judge Pauline Newman and the investigation initiated by Chief Judge Moore. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by David Post
I think I can pretty much guarantee that no same-sex couple in its right min [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:38 pm by Josh Blackman
(Curiously, Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence in Moore v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
While federal lawsuits will inevitably be filed, as I explain below and likely in more detail in later columns, I do not expect the reservation of federal judicial power to create too many real-world problems. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Accordingly, I am dubious about the reality of Smith’s entire web design business.Meanwhile, even if Smith will be able to generate interest for her wedding website design services from real customers, it’s hardly clear that any of them would be same-sex couples. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
" I do not think anyone has any idea what that phrase means. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 7:25 pm by Josh Blackman
The post After <i>Rucho</i>, <i>Dobbs</i>, and <i>Moore</i>, State Supreme Courts Take On Even More Significance appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 1:53 pm by Josh Blackman
There were several significant decisions to the left: Moore, Texas, Brackeen, and Milligan. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:18 am by Rick Hasen
The following is a guest post from Mike Parsons, Senior Counsel at ERN and Principal at Parsons Law PLLC: In this post, I offer some comments on what Moore v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:00 am by Chip Merlin
I am certainly not a professional captain, but I am with an expert crew of racing sailors starting the Transpacific Yacht Race tomorrow from Los Angeles to Honolulu. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:19 pm by Ned Foley
I offer a couple of quick additional points: First, my characterization of how the majority of SCOTUS perceives what the Pennsylvania Supreme Court did in 2020 (in… Continue reading The post A brief follow-up on Moore v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 10:34 am by Eugene Volokh
Consequently, I focus on the first stated purpose: "[t]o investigate potential wrongdoing, mismanagement and breaches of fiduciary duties … in connection with the Company's decision to publicly oppose the Parental Rights Act. [read post]