Search for: "**u.s. v. Lopez"
Results 241 - 260
of 871
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2016, 1:45 pm
U.S. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:03 pm
" A sentiment that I personally happen to agree with.But then he drops a footnote that says: "Unlike dogfighting, which is illegal everywhere in the United States, cockfighting remains legal in Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 6:43 am
The case is styled, Lopez v. [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 1:43 am
The case is styled, Lopez v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:54 pm
The district court believed it was entitled to do this pursuant to Apprendi v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 4:35 pm
Lopez 419 U.S. 565). [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:49 am
Lopez, addresses prosecutorial misconduct (Doyle error); the second, United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
Atlanta, GA Julio Lopez-De Dips, A206 011 402 (BIA Mar. 1, 2016) (2016 WL 1084489) - The BIA remanded the matter to the IJ for reconsideration of the respondent’s motion to continue in light of the respondent’s marriage to a U.S. citizen and the U.S. citizen spouse’s plans to file an I-130 for respondent. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
Atlanta, GA Julio Lopez-De Dips, A206 011 402 (BIA Mar. 1, 2016) (2016 WL 1084489) - The BIA remanded the matter to the IJ for reconsideration of the respondent’s motion to continue in light of the respondent’s marriage to a U.S. citizen and the U.S. citizen spouse’s plans to file an I-130 for respondent. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
U.S. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:08 am
Lopez–Cruz, 730 F.3d 803 (U.S. [read post]
9 May 2016, 6:42 am
Lopez et al. v. 7-Eleven Inc. et al., No. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:37 pm
See Lopez v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 7:18 am
U.S. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 5:07 am
In US v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 5:49 pm
Lopez, 419 U.S. 565, 581, 95 S. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 8:02 am
Defendant goes to jail.United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 3:16 pm
Judge Berzon concurs in today's opinion and says that, although it's not argued here, maybe she'd find a right under the Due Process Clause to be informed of the true reason for your arrest, rather than be told a made-up story by the police about why you were busted. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:23 am
Supreme Court's precedent ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
