Search for: "*king v. U. S"
Results 241 - 260
of 573
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2017, 3:00 am
“U-K-A-S-E. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 12:48 pm
For example, in Whitney v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 3:28 am
In the whimsically captioned Cupcake & Boomboom, LLC v Aslani, 2016 NY Slip Op 32310(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Nov. 22, 2016], the outcome was anything but whimsical for the defendant. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 3:17 pm
” Id. at 783 (King, J., concurring). [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 3:17 pm
” Id. at 783 (King, J., concurring). [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:20 am
The hard lesson learned by the petitioner in Matter of Norvell v Guchi’s Idea LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 32307(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Nov. 18, 2016], has been taught before, starting most prominently with the First Department’s 2013 decision in Doyle v Icon, LLC and reinforced by that court two years later in Barone v Sowers, holding that minority member claims of oppressive majority conduct including systematic… [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 12:01 am
The Court, in the opinion Boynton v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:53 pm
So they don’t use King’s actual words but paraphrases. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 8:51 am
Kings 2016); C.G. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:59 am
The case and Justice Knipel’s decision in Celauro v 4C Foods Corp., 2016 NY Slip Op 31917(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Oct. 12, 2016], is the latest in a series of litigations and court rulings between two factions of the Celauro family beginning around 2005, following the death of Nathan’s father the year before. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 3:34 am
Rennert v S.M.R. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm
Returning relists We begin this week with the sole holdover from last term, which thus begins OT2016 as the new term’s relist king. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 6:34 am
State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 12:10 pm
King, 569 U. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm
Consider, for example, Riggs v. [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 7:55 am
U-Haul Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
It was the dissents at the Fifth Circuit that raised the question of justiciability, first in Judge Higginson’s dissent when addressing the government’s request to stay the District Court’s ruling, and then by Judge King’s dissent (which drew on Judge Higginson’s work) when denying the government’s appeal of the District Court’s injunction. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 4:55 am
King, 569 U. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 5:34 am
King, 73 F.3d 1564 (U.S. [read post]
20 May 2016, 11:20 am
The Ford decision is reported at Columbia Motor Car Co. v. [read post]