Search for: "3 NY3d 1"
Results 241 - 260
of 663
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division, however, sustained the District's decision, explaining that: 1. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:00 am
The Appellate Divisions said that this argument was unavailing in light of his disciplinary history, citing Gomez v Kelly, 55 AD3d 305, reversed 12 NY3d 883 [Gomez I].In Gomez I the Appellate Division said that substantial evidence supported the findings that Gomez violated [1] his commanding officer's order to terminate his involvement in a criminal investigation; [2] failed to take possession of drugs during a police department integrity test; [3] failed to voucher… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Index No. 154634/20 Appeal No. 16180 Case No. 2021-01665 [*1]In the Matter of Jermell Martinez, Petitioner-Appellant, vCity of New York et al., Respondents-Respondents. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
As a general rule, an individual appointed to a position on a permanent basis attains such status on the effective date of such "permanent appointment" but does not attain tenure in the position until [1] he or she satisfactorily completes his or her maximum period of probation or [2] by estoppel, acquisition, default, or otherwise by operation of law or [3] as the result of the appointing authority's lawfully truncating the individual's maximum period of… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Index No. 154634/20 Appeal No. 16180 Case No. 2021-01665 [*1]In the Matter of Jermell Martinez, Petitioner-Appellant, vCity of New York et al., Respondents-Respondents. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
”The Appellate Division then noted:1. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
As a general rule, an individual appointed to a position on a permanent basis attains such status on the effective date of such "permanent appointment" but does not attain tenure in the position until [1] he or she satisfactorily completes his or her maximum period of probation or [2] by estoppel, acquisition, default, or otherwise by operation of law or [3] as the result of the appointing authority's lawfully truncating the individual's maximum period of… [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
In this proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 to compel the production of certain documents pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law [FOIL]* sought by the Petitioner [Plaintiff], the Appellate Division explained: 1. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
The facts as alleged in the complaint are accepted as true; and 3. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
The facts as alleged in the complaint are accepted as true; and 3. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
., Kapnick, González, Scarpulla, Michael, JJ.Index No. 652297/23|Appeal No. 3864, M-596|Case No. 2024-05062|[*1]Wayne Wong, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vNew York City Employees' Retirement System, et al., Defendants-Respondents. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
., Kapnick, González, Scarpulla, Michael, JJ.Index No. 652297/23|Appeal No. 3864, M-596|Case No. 2024-05062|[*1]Wayne Wong, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vNew York City Employees' Retirement System, et al., Defendants-Respondents. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
The grievant was not given an opportunity to respond to the charges of alleged misconduct before the chief of police made the decision to terminate the grievant. 3. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
The grievant was not given an opportunity to respond to the charges of alleged misconduct before the chief of police made the decision to terminate the grievant. 3. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 8:26 pm
"a significant risk of substantial harm to the . . . safety of the employee or others" (9 NYCRR 466.11[g][2][I]; Executive Law §§ 292[21-e], 296[3][a]; Pimentel v Citibank, N.A., 29 AD3d 141, 145 [1st Dept 2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 707 [2006]). [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 6:12 am
Co., 5 NY3d 467, 472 [2005] [internal quotations marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
10 May 2018, 4:19 am
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendants’ motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1) to dismiss the cause of action alleging legal malpractice insofar as asserted against the law firm. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 6:48 am
Jackson, 18 NY3d 738, 967 N.E.2d 1160, 1166–67 (2012). . . . [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
§ 3012[1][a][ii]). [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
§ 3012[1][a][ii]). [read post]