Search for: "ALEXANDER v. ALEXANDER" Results 241 - 260 of 3,198
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2017, 3:22 pm by Eugene Volokh
That’s the hot, exciting subject of Wednesday’s Nevada federal district court decision in Alexander v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 2:29 pm
According to respondents, “This Court's holding in Alexander v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:19 am by Aaron Moss
Take-Two had prior success with its de minimis defense in Solid Oak Sketches v. 2K Games, a very similar lawsuit involving tattoos used in the “NBA 2K” series of video games. [read post]
14 May 2018, 1:21 pm
This opinion primarily concerns a variety of technical and procedural issues, but the underlying facts present a difficult moral quandary. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 1:02 pm
Judge Fletcher holds that FedEx drivers aren't independent contractors even though FedEx tries to make them ones. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:19 am by Barry Friedman
Alexander Bickel was a profoundly complicated and nuanced man. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:16 pm
Well, in Alexander-David v LB Hammersmith & Fulham, those good intentions (and property law) have bitten back. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 12:27 pm by admin
In ASIC’s civil penalty proceedings against six former directors and officers of AWB including former Managing Director Andrew Alexander Lindberg, ASIC has announced that Lindberg has agreed to a Statement of Agreed Contraventions. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 8:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Jean Alexander Cosmetics, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 11:32 am
Diplomats in Spy Dispute: MOSCOW (AP) - Russia said Thursday it will expel four British diplomats and suspend counterterrorism cooperation with London, the latest move in a mounting confrontation over the radiation poisoning death of former KGB officer Alexander Litvinenko. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 6:40 pm
Date: December 7, 2009Opinion by Judge Alexander Wright, Jr.Held: Because the defendants, a doctor and a medical practice, failed to raise negative averments in their answer concerning their capacity to be sued, they were precluded from disputing their status as parties to the contract. [read post]