Search for: "AS PTO, LLC"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,053
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2023, 5:11 am
El Toro Loco Legends LLC in Kansas City and El Toro Loco Lenexa LLC in Lenexa, Kansas, paid their tipped wait staff a minimum wage of $2.30 per hour, but did not properly calculate the overtime premium owed to those employees. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 10:00 pm
Covidien LP petitioned the PTO for institution of an IPR on a patent owned by Ethicon. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 8:22 am
CNH America LLC v. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 10:00 am
Pandaloon, LLC, 2-21-cv-01323 (CDCA Apr. 7, 2022) (John W. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:55 am
Bone Care Int'l, LLC v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 10:18 am
Waterblasting, LLC v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:26 am
The patentee here intentionally failed to disclose its its pre-filing sales-activity to the PTO during prosecution. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 7:34 pm
True Health Diagnostics LLC, Supreme Court Docket No. 17-997 (2018) questions presented: In this case, the patents were fully examined by the PTO and found to be novel and not obvious, including for one of the patents, confirmation after two ex parte reexaminations. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 9:00 am
The PTO responds that theBoard did not find a likelihood of reverse confusion andthat its finding that the fame of the marks, the fifthDuPont factor, is neutral is supported by substantialevidence.We agree with the PTO that the Board did not find alikelihood of reverse confusion. [read post]
26 Nov 2006, 6:11 pm
In re Gunn GP LLC, Serial No. 78497204 (October 30, 2006) [not citable].The reader will recall that in Knight Textile Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 7:50 am
., January 14, 2015), the Court denied related motions filed by defendants M&G USA Corporation and M&G Polymers USA, LLC (collectively “M&G”) seeking to stay the action pending the completion of the reexamination process of the patent-in-suit by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) and seeking relief from the final judgment previously entered against M&G, which was affirmed by the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
In re Heeb Media, LLC, 89 USPQ2d 1071 (TTAB 2008) [precedential].Applicant Heeb Media, LLC argued that Examining Attorney Allison Schrody "ignored the context and manner in which applicant's mark is used when determining whether the likely meaning of applicant's mark is disparaging to the Jewish community. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
New Practical Guidance Content Employment Application (AL) – by Anthony Michel, Michel & King LLC Equal Employment Opportunity Policy (with Acknowledgment) (AL) – by Anthony Michel, Michel & King LLC Family and Medical Leave Policy (with Acknowledgment) (AL) – by Anthony Michel, Michel & King LLC Internship Agreement (Learning Contract) (AL) – by Anthony Michel, Michel & King LLC Non-compete, Customer and Employee… [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:58 am
For example, Snowflake Enterprises LLC has filed multiple trademark applications for offensive marks, examples of which can be found on the PTO’s website (a version of the N-word can be seen here and a swastika symbol can be seen here). [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 10:11 pm
Tivoli, LLC, No. 2013-1140 (Fed. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 7:20 am
" CIVIX-DDI LLC v. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 7:21 am
The PTO approved the application and SZ opposed its registration when it published for opposition in late March. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 7:48 am
Lee and MCM Portfolio LLC v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 7:46 am
Butamax™ Advanced Biofuels LLC v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 9:43 am
See Walker Digital, LLC v. [read post]
