Search for: "ATES V. STATE" Results 241 - 260 of 859
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2012, 9:50 am by Anthony Colangelo
District Court for the District of Columbia referenced my most-noted formulation of this principle in a foreign-cubed piracy case, United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2017, 10:00 pm by Bill Marler
There were 35, or 17 percent, that were V. alginolyticus, and 26, or 13 percent that were V. vulnificus. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:03 pm by John Bellinger
In a surprising development, less than a week after last Tuesday’s oral argument in Kiobel v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:42 am by nflatow
State Department Legal Advisor, argue for completely exempting corporations from suit under the ATS. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 2:41 pm by John Bellinger
Last Friday afternoon, while many people were enjoying a long July 4th weekend, the Obama Administration quietly filed a remarkably strong amicus brief  urging the Supreme Court to reverse the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Bauman v. [read post]
The article dissects the legal reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum[1] and argues that the majority simply got it wrong principally by conflating ‘the jurisdictional and cause of action aspects of an ATS suit’. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 9:59 am by Ingrid Wuerth
The high court has interpreted that grant of lawmaking authority narrowly in its trio of ATS cases: Sosa v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 7:17 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Cardona v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
Whether, absent state action, a complaint that a private actor has conducted a clinical trial of a medication without adequately informed consent can surmount the "high bar to new private causes of action" under the ATS. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:28 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 518 U.S. 81, 100 (1996). [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 6:51 am by Nabiha Syed
United States and Hill v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:34 pm
  A finding that the ATS does not "apply" to extraterritorial conduct also seems inconsistent with the Court's own pronouncement in Sosa v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 8:48 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The district court dismissed the actions for failure to state a claim within the jurisdiction conferred by the ATS. [read post]