Search for: "Ames v. The People Of The State Of New York" Results 241 - 260 of 1,535
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2022, 7:21 am by Philip Zelikow
But much of his fire was directed at a different approach that had been suggested in a New York Times op-ed by Laurence Tribe and Jeremy Lewin. [read post]
7 May 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
In this case, Judge Koeltl wrote: To state a claim for defamation under New York law, a plaintiff must allege, among other elements, a statement that is “of and concerning” the plaintiff. [read post]
4 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
They are only for Bad People, you see.But what happens when the state decides that what we thought of as regular people are suddenly, from a legal standpoint, Bad People? [read post]
3 May 2022, 4:18 am by Emma Snell
All 27 E.U. member states would need to back the new sanctions proposals, and diplomats warn that a consensus might take some time. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
See Note 44, ante (warning against broad liability schemes that would encourage landlords to act as law enforcement).[15] The New York intermediate appellate court took a similar view in Gill v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
Thus, he joined a dissent by Chief Justice Melville Fuller in United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 8:42 am by silverman_admin
Remington was founded in New York in 1816 by Eliphalet Remington. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
One, The New York World, commented that the decision "provokes the indignant contempt of thinking men. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
Here is the column: Announcing his new taxation plan to raise an additional $1 trillion, President Biden repeated his oft-stated assurance that “I am a capitalist. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am by Matthew Ackerman
  The following year, I did the same job on the Second Circuit, which covers New York, Vermont, and Connecticut. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
That law authorizes private enforcement of Texas’s facially unconstitutional law.As The New York Timesdescribed it, “By empowering everyday people and expressly banning enforcement by state officials, the law, known as S.B. 8, was designed to escape judicial review in federal court. [read post]