Search for: "Appeal of Merchant's Market"
Results 241 - 260
of 409
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2014, 7:42 am
The case is currently on appeal to the Federal Court. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 2:08 pm
That means users will have to pay transaction fees at market rates. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 8:03 pm
It does not. (...)The Commerce Clause “dictates that no State may force an out-of-state merchant to seek regulatory approval in one State before undertaking a transaction in another. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
News items from the security site Krebsonsecurity report that credit and debit card accounts stolen in the recent Target data breach have been flooding underground black card markets, selling in batches of one million cards, and going for asking prices of between $20 to more than $100 per card. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am
But contrary to popular belief (and the assumptions of several courts of appeals), that payment—less than $2000 annually for each full-time employee—is nota penalty for violation of a legal duty; it is, instead, a tax to help defray the social cost of subsidizing the insurance purchased on the exchanges. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:29 am
The court describes the differences between the international and US editions: The textbooks plaintiffs publish are customized for the geographical markets in which they are sold. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 3:00 am
The plaintiff alleged, among other things, that the defendants violated the Colorado Consumer Protection Act and breached the implied warranty of merchantability. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 10:29 am
The implication of the broader scope of Chapter 38 for debt collection cases is that the plaintiff can recover attorney’s fees even if it does not base its claim on breach of contract (i.e. breach of credit card agreement in a credit card debt suit), but uses an alternative theory, such as account stated, which courts of appeals in some appellate districts (but not all) have blessed as a viable theory of recovery even though the original creditor is a bank, rather than a… [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 7:26 am
The appeal was directly to the Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 7:26 am
The appeal was directly to the Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 10:47 am
Covered Persons also include third-party marketers, and may include certain other arrangements, such as fee rebates. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 1:37 pm
For example, merchants can’t state in the ad headline “Free” and then in the disclaimer say “There’s a minimum charge. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 2:12 pm
Also like gold, Bitcoins fluctuate in value, often wildly so, with the market shifting rapidly every day. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 4:41 pm
According to the merchants, American Express used its monopoly power in the market for charge cards to force merchants to accept credit cards at rates approximately 30% higher than the fees for competing credit cards. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:55 pm
A recent case from the California Court of Appeals, Lloyd v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 10:53 am
And each individual merchant has only lost, and thus can only hope to recover, a small fraction of that amount. [read post]
12 May 2013, 5:54 pm
Yelp refused to comply with this order while the appeal was being prepared, and was subsequently held in contempt (a finding that is also being sought to be reversed on appeal). [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:38 am
”In his petition for review, Yeager asked: “Does California’s single-publication rule govern the accrual of a Lanham Act claim arising from a web-based merchant’s refusal to remove a celebrity’s unauthorized endorsement from a merchant’s website? [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 1:49 am
Mining for coins becomes more difficult as time goes by and the market grows. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:04 am
Well, here are five appeals that were decided in March 2013. [read post]
