Search for: "Appellate Division, First Judicial Department, Supreme Court of the State of New York" Results 241 - 260 of 426
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2014, 4:31 pm by Patricia Salkin
Inc v Adirondack Park Agency, 990 N.Y.S. 2d 643 (A.D. 3 Dept. 7/3/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/appellate-division-third-department/2014/516901.html Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Standards of Review Tagged: Adirondack Club, Adirondack Park, Adirondack Park Agency, LLC, Tupper Lake Boat Club [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Transcribing the hearing in a disciplinary arbitration proceeding2014 NY Slip Op 05700, Appellate Division, First DepartmentIn this CPLR Article 75 action Supreme Court’s confirmed the arbitrator’s decision imposing the penalty of termination on an employee [Employee] of the New York City Transit Authority [NYCTA]. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 3:39 am by Peter Mahler
 ”Inasmuch as petitioner’s compliance with Business Corporation Law § 1106 gave Supreme Court jurisdiction over the corporations,” wrote the court, “we find that the court properly denied respondents’ motion to dismiss the first and third causes of action seeking judicial dissolution of the corporations. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”***Accordingly, said the Appellate Division, the State’s motion to dismiss was properly denied by Supreme Court. * New York State Constitution, Article VI, §25[a]. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 5:18 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A New York Family Lawyer said that, on January 10, 1992, the 13-year-old appellant was arrested. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
That decision was upheld by the Appellate Division, Second Department. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 3:51 am by Peter Mahler
The court’s brief decision aroused my curiosity, mostly because it didn’t mention the LLC’s state of formation which matters greatly because in some states, including New York, the LLC statutes mandate a written operating agreement. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:35 am by Peter Mahler
I’ll be on the panel along with Associate Justice David Friedman of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, First Department; Vice Chancellor Travis Laster of the Delaware Court of Chancery; Delaware attorney Kurt Heyman of Proctor Heyman LLP; and New York attorney Jeffrey Eilender of Schlam Stone & Dolan LLP. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 3:17 am by Peter Mahler
I’ll be on the panel along with Associate Justice David Friedman of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, First Department; Vice Chancellor Travis Laster of the Delaware Court of Chancery; Delaware attorney Kurt Heyman of Proctor Heyman LLP; and New York attorney Jeffrey Eilender of Schlam Stone & Dolan LLP. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 4:11 am by David DePaolo
There can be no jury trial in New York Workers' Compensation claims (and in most states), and the rules of evidence do not apply in comp in the same way as in civil proceedings. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 2:18 pm by Stephen Bilkis
We have repeatedly quoted the United States Supreme Court's description of it as a paradigm of judicial restraint. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
The doctrine of judicial estoppel bars a party securing a ruling in his or her favor based on taking a certain position from advancing a contrary position in another action Becerril v City of New York Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene, 2013 NY Slip Op 06783, Appellate Division, First Department The assistant director [AD] of a day care center applied facility applied for a position with New York City… [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 11:53 am by Stephen Bilkis
A New York Child Custody Lawyer said the Appellate Division, in finding that the Family Court judge had demonstrated hostility toward the father and his attorney, ordered that all further proceedings be conducted before a different judge. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 12:07 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Appellate Division looked to decisions in other states and found that most courts that have considered suits by disgruntled parents against attorneys appointed by courts to protect children have granted, on public policy grounds, absolute quasi-judicial immunity to the attorneys for actions taken within the scope of their appointments. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 11:03 am
Defendant filed an appeal, pro se at the Appellate Division, Second Department. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 6:23 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Appellate Division looked to decisions in other states and found that most courts that have considered suits by disgruntled parents against attorneys appointed by courts to protect children have granted, on public policy grounds, absolute quasi-judicial immunity to the attorneys for actions taken within the scope of their appointments. [read post]