Search for: "Apple v. State" Results 241 - 260 of 4,008
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2016, 4:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
These facts are sufficient to state a claim for promissory estoppel.* Multimedia Patent Trust v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:50 am by Florian Mueller
Apple's previous appeal related only to the denial of a permanent injunction, not to infringement, validity or damages issues.The patents at issue in that case (this is still the first Apple v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 11:34 pm by Florian Mueller
Apple and the CMs [= contract manufacturers] are aligned on that claim due to their relationship in the production, manufacture of Apple iPhones and iPads. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:17 pm by Florian Mueller
But Judge Koh's cherished "Groundhog Day" principle is that what wasn't allowed at previous Apple v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 4:15 am by Florian Mueller
Cheney of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) gave notice that the investigation of Ericsson's complaint over Apple's alleged infringement of cellular standard-essential patents (SEPs)--with Ericsson seeking a limited exclusion order against certain Apple gadgets and Apple arguing that an import ban over SEPs gives rise to an "unclean hands" defense--has been reassigned to Administrative Law Judge Bryan F. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 10:20 am by Florian Mueller
Less than ten hours later, Apple scored another win over the Google subsidiary: the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit just denied a motion by Motorola Mobility for a rehearing. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 9:19 pm by Florian Mueller
The problem is that such petitions clog the PTAB system and slow down the resolution of objectively urgent cases.These are the seven Apple v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:47 pm by Florian Mueller
While preliminary injunction requests are adjudged rather quickly, this here is an appeal from a final ruling on a permanent injunction.But if we change the perspective and think about this not just in terms of case numbers (11-cv-01846 being the number of first Apple v. [read post]