Search for: "Asbestos Products Liability v."
Results 241 - 260
of 552
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2014, 8:08 am
Many product liability cases involve multiple defendants. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 7:18 am
As we mentioned before, the Pennsylvania high court took Tincher expressly to decide whether current Pennsylvania product liability law, based on Azzarello v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
A product distributor in the oil-drilling industry was sued by several individuals claiming they were exposed to asbestos in the products distributed. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 1:35 am
Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
., Jewett V. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 3:50 pm
” In 1910, a GM engineer testifying in MacPherson v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 12:00 am
” In 1910, a GM engineer testifying in MacPherson v. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 3:11 pm
In re Rezulin Products Liability Litig., 309 F.Supp. 2d 531, 541 (S.D.N.Y. 2004). [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 11:39 am
Imposing tort liability for failure to warn often makes sense in the context of a product sold to consumers by sophisticated sellers. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 5:41 am
The trial court jury in Webb v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 9:35 am
The use of asbestos in the firm's products continued for at least a decade after Georgia-Pacific bought the firm. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
Liability Litig. , 2008 U.S. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
Apple Inc. 12-1158Issue: (1) Whether the offer for sale and/or sale of a product that embodies a patented invention can directly infringe a method claim under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
In Rosa v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 9:33 am
There is no question that a number of the company's products contained asbestos. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
If an MDL decision was favorable to the defendant only on, say, asbestos exposure product identification (the most common example by far), we have not included it.Caveat #4. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 1:30 pm
Moore v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
What we quarrel with is admitting asbestos-style rank hearsay for product identification purposes.In a busy week, one can expect pain pump litigation to contribute its share, and it did. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 7:35 pm
Last summer, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals decided Dixon v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 3:09 am
Webb v Special Electric Company Inc. [read post]
