Search for: "Attorney General v. Superior Court"
Results 241 - 260
of 3,246
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2014, 4:56 am
Thereafter, on re-argument before an en banc panel of the Pennsylvania Superior Court, the previous decisions were reversed and that court held that the communications from the attorney to the expert were not discoverable. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 6:00 am
Recently, in Commonwealth v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:19 pm
The issue decided by the California Supreme Court in Arias v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:18 pm
Friedman represents individuals charged with crimes in the Superior Court of New Jersey in all counties, the United States District Court in New Jersey and New York City, and all New Jersey municipal courts. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 5:58 am
Superior Court Rule 23 and the DCCPPA private attorney general statute lacked the hallmarks of a Rule 23 class action. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
Keep Reading Baker v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 1:10 pm
It is now on track to be heard next month in the Fresno County Superior Court. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 9:43 am
Galati claims the Act stipulates only Court of Appeal and Superior Court judges, or a lawyer who has been a member of the bar for at least 10 years, can be appointed. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 12:36 pm
(“Applied”) in Orange County Superior Court. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 12:59 pm
On July 13, 2017, the California Supreme Court greatly expanded the scope of discovery available under California’s Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (“PAGA”). [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 2:40 pm
Yesterday, New Jersey's Attorney general filed a religious discrimination suit against Mahwah Township. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
In the case of Shiflett v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 11:56 am
Superior Court of California could hardly surprise anybody who noticed the court’s near-unanimous ruling last month in BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
12 May 2018, 7:18 am
The Superior Court of Los Angeles County, et al, the California Supreme Court upheld the lower court’s decision that classified a class of delivery drivers as employees rather than independent contractors, as Dynamex had been classifying them. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:37 pm
Superior Court had dealt with a very different issue. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 3:51 pm
” Philbin Brothers, LLC v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 2:35 pm
However, in an interesting decision handed down earlier today (Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 11:00 am
Co. v Superior Court (1997) 16 C4th 1101, 1107, 68 CR 2d 883, quoting Greyhound Corp. v Superior Court (1961) 56 C2d 355, 377, 15 CR 90. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
Superior Court (1970) 2 Cal.3d 557, 564.) [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 11:01 am
If I were Attorney General of California, Judge Carney's decision in Jones v. [read post]
