Search for: "B Parker"
Results 241 - 260
of 887
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2019, 10:12 am
Specifically, Sections 36(b) and 36(c) of the AECA (codified at 22 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:45 am
Parker v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
” Parker Drilling Management Services, Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 5:29 am
Its $25 million Series B round last July was led by Menlo Ventures, one of the earliest Silicon Valley venture firms that also has a diverse portfolio that includes Uber, Roku, and Warby Parker. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:53 pm
Its $25 million Series B round last July was led by Menlo Ventures, one of the earliest Silicon Valley venture firms that also has a diverse portfolio that includes Uber, Roku, and Warby Parker. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 12:35 pm
”). 9 Parker v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
This is now controlled by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(4)(B), under which discovery from such experts may only be obtained upon a showing of exceptional circumstances in which it is impracticable for the party seeking discovery to obtain facts or opinions on the same subject matter.8 Right to Jury Trial, Commissioner Appointments and Standards Jury trials in condemnation actions are different from normal jury trials inasmuch as the jury’s decision in condemnation trials is limited to… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
B. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
B. 1963MichiganConstitutionandSubsequent Court Rules The 1963 Constitution deleted the provision that a jury would have the right to review “the necessity for using such property” that existed in the prior constitutions. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
The Interplay between the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause and the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause: Is the Supreme Court’s Test for “Public Use” Merely Rational Basis? [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division agreed, explaining that arbitration awards are entitled to collateral estoppel effect and, citing Guard-Life Corp. v Parker Hardware Mfg. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 9:19 am
I was excited to see R(Z) v Hackney LBC & Agudas Israel HA (2019) EWHC 139 (Admin), because it is the first case in which the thorny issue of “nomination” rights and, potentially, the concept of a “true void” have arisen for full decision by a court of record (of which I know anyway), and before the Divisional court (Lindblom LJ & Sir Kenneth Parker) too. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Medicare Coverage and Payment Requirements Medicare Part B covers Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics, and Supplies (DMEPOS), including orthotic braces. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Medicare Coverage and Payment Requirements Medicare Part B covers Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics, and Supplies (DMEPOS), including orthotic braces. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:37 am
• Christopher B. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:37 am
• Christopher B. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 2:51 pm
By Anthony B. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
John Elwood reviews the first relists of 2019. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:39 pm
Texas Prosecutors are Aggressively Targeting Criminal Home Health Fraud (January 9, 2019): Despite real progress being made with respect to regulatory compliance, home health agencies, their owners, and affiliated health care professionals (such as referring / supervising physicians, therapists and staff) remain under strict government scrutiny. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
The Regulatory Review is pleased to highlight our top regulatory essays of 2018 authored by a select number of our many contributors. [read post]
