Search for: "Bare v. Bare" Results 241 - 260 of 4,971
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2012, 3:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Barely submerged below the decisions of trial and appellate courts is the fear that if legal malpractice litigation is given full rein, there will be a legal malpractice case which immediately follows every trial of any nature. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 2:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Barely submerged below the decisions of trial and appellate courts is the fear that if legal malpractice litigation is given full rein, there will be a legal malpractice case which immediately follows every trial of any nature. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:27 am by sally
Regina v C [2010] EWCA Crim 2971; [2011] WLR (D) 347 “Where a defendant wished to challenge evidence of earlier convictions which the Crown sought to deploy as relevant to the question of whether the defendant was responsible for the commission of the offences for which he was on trial, the defendant’s bare assertion that he did not commit those earlier offences was inadequate; it was essential that the defendant provide a detailed defence statement identifying all the… [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 2:44 pm
District Court, Southern District of New York: Burck d/b/a The Naked Cowboy v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 5:30 am
But possibly the strangest this year is Martek Biosciences Corp. v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 5:20 pm
The Supreme Court today  vacated the Third Circuit's decision and remanded the case to that court "for further consideration in light of FCC v. [read post]