Search for: "Batson v. Batson"
Results 241 - 260
of 692
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2014, 2:19 pm
Up to this point, the Supreme Court has prohibited attorneys from exercising peremptory challenges to remove jurors because of their race (Batson v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 9:07 am
Justice Alito delivered the opinion for the Court in Davis v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 8:16 am
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts in Foster v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 7:28 am
No prior ruling of the Court, the Justices said in an unsigned, apparently unanimous opinion, requires that the judge have been on hand during jury selection in order to evaluate a claimed violation of Batson v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:03 pm
Flowers, scheduled to be heard by the Supreme Court on March 20, will examine whether the Mississippi Supreme Court erred in its application of Batson v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 9:08 am
Robinson v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 8:16 am
The defense attorney objects, claiming that the evidence demonstrates these challenges were exercised on the basis of race in violation of Batson v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 2:02 pm
3 Feb 2009, 1:16 pm
In a welcome judicial recognition of the problem, the Second Circuit has ruled in Dolphy v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:17 pm
The defendant appealed, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his Batson challenge or, in the alternative, failed to make adequate findings of fact as required by State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 7:56 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 12:42 pm
The case involving the removal of a juror because of his sexual orientation (Smithkline Beecham Corporation v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 2:43 pm
While many people believe that attorneys especially prosecutors strike potential jurors because of race, which violates Batson v Kentucky, proving such conduct has been historically difficult. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 5:53 am
Ibid.; see also Wilkinson v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 5:30 am
Dolphy v Mantello, No. 03-2738-pr (2d Cir. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 1:17 pm
Kentucky, and can thus rule that the absence of a complete video of the voir dire “possibly” meant there was no Batson challenge; and (2) whether, under Strickland v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 6:25 am
The leading case on the issue of raising an objection to an adverse party's use of a preemptory challenge for an improper reason is Batson v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:38 am
LouisianaDocket: 10-386Issue(s): Whether a court's modification of the three-step Batson v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 3:34 pm
" Matter of Robar v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 11:07 am
Santiago- Davila, 26 M.J. 380 (C.A.A.F. 1988), applying Batson v. [read post]
