Search for: "Bell Media Inc." Results 241 - 260 of 313
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2010, 4:15 am by Maxwell Kennerly
" It does not matter, for example, that goal and likely effect of the proposed boycott is to benefit consumers in the end by driving subscription prices down: The Supreme Court's treatment of monopsony cases strongly suggests that suppliers (under Southwestern Bell's theory of the market, the location owners) are protected by antitrust laws even when the anti-competitive activity does not harm end-users. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
BIO Policy Briefing raises the IP social media question (PatentlyBIOtech) WTO’s Lamy continues engagement on IP issues (Intellectual Property Watch)   Global - Trade Marks / Brands Five reasons not to file a trade mark (IP Think Tank) (China Hearsay) International trade mark registrations top one million (WIPO) (Managing Intellectual Property) Branding, innovation and premium pricing: the Procter & Gamble challenge (IP finance)   Global - Patents… [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Haitian Centers Council, Inc., 509 U.S. 155 (1993).What did the Ninth Circuit say about that? [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 12:35 pm by Schachtman
Bell Asbestos Mines, No. 86-1197, unpublished slip op. at 5 (3d Cir., Dec. 30, 1987) (per curiam) (citing Section 433A as Pennsylvania law, and Martin v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 10:18 pm by Michael Douglas
It might allow for service on a person outside Australia by email or even social media, contrary to historical practice: see  Yemini v Twitter International Company [2022] FCA 318, [5]. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
DOES 1-62, ND Illinois 2013http://t.co/8H6OdZw8as -> Copyright claim fails because of limitation period Bell v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 1:48 am by Jon Gelman
(ed.); Nitric Acid and Fertilizer Nitrates; New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., 1985. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 11:25 am by Cathy Siegner
“I don’t know if anything has happened since then,” Bell told Food Safety News. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 4:34 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/zWGXy6 (Jones Day) You Cannot Unring A Bell – Judge Peck’s Da Silva Moore Opinion Will Continue To Be Influential Despite Objection - bit.ly/AxirNA (Brendon Hollinder) Reports and Resources An Overview of State eDiscovery Rules - bit.ly/yJWT5V (David Canfield) Breach Fatigue? [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:46 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
In an era of giant corporate structures, utilizing the national media to sell their wares, the original concern for an emerging manufacturing industry has given way to the view that it is now the consumer who must be protected. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:18 pm
  Mathew Johnson, Media Awareness Network Educational exceptions, anti-circumvention and fair dealing not inhibit media education. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice & Comment blog, Bernard Bell discusses last week’s decision in Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]