Search for: "Beverages, Inc., in Re"
Results 241 - 260
of 386
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2014, 6:32 am
Facebook even lets you add an emoticon to share how you’re feeling in your status update. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:54 am
See In re Kahn, 441 F.3d 977, 988 (Fed. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 10:25 am
Domaines Pinnacle, Inc. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 3:31 am
November 13, 2013 - 11 AM: In re Mother Earth Brewing, LLC, Serial No. 77716598 [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark shown below left, for "Beer, excluding both organic beer and beer comprised solely of organic components; Brewed malt-based alcoholic beverage in the nature of a beer, excluding both organic beer and beer comprised solely of organic components"[BREWING disclaimed], in view of the registered mark shown below right, for "beer comprised solely of organic… [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Liggett Group, Inc. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 1:06 pm
Donations of beverages from Periscope Cellars, Ninkasi Brewing Company, Peak Organic Brewing Company, and Matagrano Inc. were also deeply appreciated by our guests. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 4:45 am
In re Frito-Lay North America, Inc. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 10:41 am
Marriott Hotel Services, Inc., SCCQ-11-747 (S. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:27 pm
Dyson, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 3:23 am
In re Argo Tea, Inc., Serial No. 85011197 (May 9, 2013)[not precedential].The PTO must establish genericness by "clear evidence," the key issue being whether the relevant public primarily uses or understands the applied-for term to refer to the category or class of goods at issue. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 2:56 am
In re Gulf Coast Nutritionals, Inc., Serial No. 77980412 (January 29, 2013) [precedential].The Board first pointed to In re Bose Corp., 192 USPQ 213, 216 (CCPA 1976) regarding the role of the specimen of use:An important function of specimens in a trademark application is, manifestly, to enable the PTO to verify the statements made in the application regarding trademark use. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 3:30 am
ZAO Gruppa Predprivatii Ost., Opposition No. 911794997 and Cancellation No. 92047115 [Consolidated petition to cancel a registration for the mark TURGOVY DOM SHUSTOV (in Cyrillic characters) for "alcoholic beverages, namely, prepared cocktails, malt coolers, tea-based beverages, punch" on the grounds of fraud and abandonment, and opposition to registration of the design mark shown below for "Alcoholic beverages, namely, distilled spirits, gin, rum, sake, alcoholic… [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:55 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 10:20 pm
This is somewhat of a reprint of an Op-ed of a few years ago. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 10:05 am
The license holder/appellant brought up the claims that the ALJs findings were contrary to the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel because the Nuisance Abatement Law action had been dismissed. . [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 4:10 am
In re Viterra Inc.., 101 U.S.P.Q.2d 1905 (Fed. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 9:17 am
” In re Baker Hughes, Inc., 215 F.3d 1297, 1301 (Fed. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 2:00 am
” In re Sunbelt Beverage at *6 (Del. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 9:51 am
Nestle manufactures and distributes food and beverages in the United States. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 8:30 pm
And all over Stockton you can hear the cheering: “We’re number one, we’re number one” because they’re the largest governmental entity to file for bankruptcy. [read post]
