Search for: "Brown v. Harms" Results 241 - 260 of 1,653
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:11 am by Guadalupe Luna
In contrast the focus here centers on National Meat Association v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 1:41 pm by Ron Coleman
Compare the findings in this case with the finding of no consumer nexus in the recent Reit v. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
Various decisions have had to deal with this difficult issue, the courts considering, for example, that what they need to assess is whether the language used ‘is beyond the pale of what is tolerable in our society’ (DPP v Collins [2006]). [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:30 am by koherston
Brown (herstontennesseefamilylaw.com) Fluctuating Child Support Reversed in Hendersonville Post-Divorce Dispute: Allen v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 11:19 am
  Judge Brown offers a silly dissent, in which she invokes 9/11 as the catch-all argument. [read post]