Search for: "Brown v. Phillips"
Results 241 - 260
of 367
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm
The case of Parkwood Leisure Limited v Alemo-Herron and others will be heard from Wednesday 13 to Thursday 14 April 2011, also by Lords Hope, Walker, Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 12:00 am
The outcome, however, was by no means certain given the reasoning of the three members who dissented (Lords Phillips, Roger and Brown) arguing that it was necessary to show causation, i.e. that the individual would have been detained in any event, for the cause of action to arise. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm
Brown, (9th Cir. 1990) 913 F.2d 1399. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm
Second, on 6 and 7 April 2011, Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker, Mance and Clarke will hear Jivraj v Hashwani. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
Zinman v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:02 am
The majority Justices (Lords Phillips, Brown, Collins, Kerr and Dyson) held that the appropriate starting point for the analysis of the question of the liability of expert witnesses for their evidence was that the existence of any immunity had to be clearly justified. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm
Lumba v Secretary of State for the Home Deparment – a case of driving government policy further underground? [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
On Tuesday 29 and Wednesday 30 March 2011, Lords Phillips, Walker, Mance, Collins and Clarke will hear NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am
Lords Phillips and Brown (with whom Lord Rodger agrees) dissent and hold that because the appellants would have been lawfully detained the Secretary of State is not liable to them in false imprisonment: [319]-[334], [343]-[360]. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
By a majority (Lords Phillips, Brown and Rodger dissenting), the court held that the fact that the appellants would have lawfully been detained in any event did not affect the Secretary of State’s liability in false imprisonment. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am
On Monday 21 and Tuesday 22 March, Lords Hope, Rodger, Brown, Kerr and Dyson will hear the devoluation appeal of Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm
This week there are three linked appeals to be heard in the Supreme Court from Monday 14 March to Thursday 17 March 2011 by Lords Phillips, Hope and Rodger, Lady Hale and Lords Clarke, Brown and Dyson: R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 12:42 pm
It will be for the seven Justices (Lords Phillips, Hope, Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown and Clarke, and Sir John Dyson SCJ) hearing the appeals in these two parallel cases finally to determine the relationship of the Upper Tribunal to the courts in England and in Scotland respectively and, thus, whether the English and Scottish stories shall share the same ending. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
From Monday 7 to Wednesday 9 March 2011, Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale, and Lords Mance and Collins will hear Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 10:38 am
FEC (2010); Paul Clement in McDonald v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 10:19 am
It will be heard on Monday 7 and Tuesday 8 February 2011 by Lords Phillips, Rodger and Walker, Lady Hale and Lords Brown, Mance and Clarke. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 10:11 am
Brown, 939 F.2d 1558, 1563 (Fed. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:26 am
By Michael Kiely & Phillip Tate In his budget submitted on January 10, 2011, one week after taking office, Governor Jerry Brown proposes to slash $12 billion in State spending in a wide array of areas, including, welfare, health services and higher education. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 5:23 am
(b) Andy Gray, Sienna Miller and Nicola Phillips? [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:05 pm
Phillips, 775 So. 2d 921, 922 (Fla. 2000). [read post]
