Search for: "C Diaz"
Results 241 - 260
of 423
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2011, 1:05 am
There were three amici briefs mentioned for this case:DALE C. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 4:17 am
Well, (1) Cruz told Diaz that Vasquez and Perez had the money with them; (2) no money was found during the searches of Vasquez and Perez; and (3) two drug-detection dogs indicated that there were narcotics in the passenger-side dashboard of the car. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 12:19 pm
“Redspeckable” replied: “C’mon man! [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 1:07 pm
’’ (Johnny Diaz,Boston Globe). [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 6:45 pm
By Michael Diaz, Jr., Carlos F. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:00 am
In You're My Huckleberry, I'm Your Jim, BLB post author C. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 2:46 pm
C. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 12:18 am
Diaz. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:44 am
[Note: This case follows, without out saying so, the rationale of the California Supreme Court in Diaz that pre-technology cases control. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 6:35 am
Diaz, 2010 U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:52 am
That was the language required under 2929.14(C) up until State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 6:51 pm
By Michael Diaz Jr., Esq., Carlos F. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:00 pm
Russo, C. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 2:18 am
Diaz, 2011 Cal. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:55 am
Ceguera a la elección, cómo inventamos una explicación para nuestras decisiones. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:59 am
Diaz, 2010 U.S. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 2:19 pm
Diaz-Lopez, No. 09-50604 (11-9-10) (Gould with O'Scannlain and M. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:49 pm
Combs states that the website is registered to James Diaz, who may not be a person. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 9:17 pm
Diaz. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:12 pm
LEXIS 109 (October 1, 2010)*: We affirm the superior court’s decision because: (1) Diaz’s officer-escorted trip to and interrogation at the travel agency did not implicate her Fourth Amendment rights as she was already in DOC custody when the DOC officers “seized” her; (2) the DOC officers’ actions, although disturbing, did not “shock the conscience” as required for a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment; (3) Diaz’s return to… [read post]