Search for: "CASH V. STATE" Results 241 - 260 of 5,224
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Even so, to benefit from this cash flow advantage, Lord Hodge states that the taxpayer must formally calculate his tax liability on the return itself; it is not enough simply to include the final figure as part of a covering letter. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:53 pm by Staff
NOT CHARGED – Possession of Marijuana and Possession of Dangerous Drugs for Sale, State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
If a State Department’s policy memorandum constitutes a "rule or regulation" within the meaning of the State’s Constitution it must be filed with the Secretary of State before it can  have the force and effect of lawPlainview-Old Bethpage Congress of Teachers v New York State Health Ins. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:45 pm by Alan S. Kaplinsky
  (The Fifth Circuit heard oral argument in March 2019 and last month directed the parties to file letter briefs regarding what action the court should take in light of the en banc Fifth Circuit’s decision in Collins v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 4:44 am by Charles Sartain
Impose reasonable regulations, as producing states have done. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 11:34 am by Liisa Speaker
The court discussed at length Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v Hitchcock, 270 Mich 72, 80; 258 NW 214 (1935). [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 8:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Franklin also owns several firearms, which the Government contends "have long been recognized as being 'tools of the drug trade.'" [Doc. 87 at 6 n.2 (quoting in part United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 9:08 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The Supreme Court eventually struck down the New York law in Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 9:14 am
Cash indisputably plays a significant role as circumstantial evidence in narcotics cases (citations omitted), however, and we conclude that 'an objective observer with the same knowledge concerning the suspect as the police had would conclude that the [question of the narcotics officer concerning the ownership of cash found in the kitchen during the execution of the search warrant] was reasonably likely to elicit [an incriminating] response' (People v Ferro, 63… [read post]