Search for: "COX V STATE" Results 241 - 260 of 1,202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2013, 8:00 am by Howard Friedman
United States Department of Justice, 2013 U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 8:39 pm
Further, a conviction for endangering the welfare of a child under Penal Law section 260.10(1) conclusively establishes a lack of moral integrity" CONTRACTS, JUDGMENT ENFORCEMENT, LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW, PROPERTY LAW & REAL ESTATE Cox v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 7:17 am by Eric Goldman
Cox Communications, Inc., 2020 WL 3121306 (E.D. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Reassigning individuals to perform duties alleged to be those of a position classified and allocated to a lower title and gradeAlston v Bertoni, 2016 NY Slip Op 02897, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentAs the result of a perceived increase in criminal activity, Village of Endicott Mayor John Bertoni, directed Endicott Police Chief Michael Cox to assign detectives to police patrol duties. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
AMORPHOUS https://t.co/S8NVGY0uEG -> Meaning of RMI in DMCA reviewed in TOMELLERI v ZAZZLE https://t.co/Kk5HQJReIV -> Personal jurisdiction founded on selling server loaded with Iinfringing software to State EPIC TECH v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
  The 1st District’s decision in State v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:45 pm by Unknown
"Caught in Sri Lanka’s Anti-Muslim Backlash, Evicted Refugees Search for Safe Homes," The New Humanitarian, 29 July 2019 [text]"Coming Home to Conflict: Why Afghan Returnees Say They Were Better Off as Refugees," The New Humanitarian, 1 Aug. 2019   [text]Human Rights in Southeast Asia: The Rohingya Crisis in Focus (RI Blog, July 2019) [text]The Necessity to Develop a Regional Refugee Framework for South Asia (Völkerrechtsblog, April 2019)… [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
*A United States District Court judge granted the City’s motion for summary judgment, holding that Matthews had spoken as a public employee and not as a citizen and thus his speech was not protected by the First Amendment.Citing Cox v Warwick Valley Central School District, 654 F3d 267, the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals said that the test it applied in cases in which a plaintiff asserts a First Amendment retaliation claim requires the plaintiff to establish that: (1)… [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:24 am by Mike "No Man" Navarre
Takara, Senior Airman (E-4), United States Air Force, Petitioners v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 5:15 am
According to the Motion:"Chairman Cox noted that the Stoneridge case was on all fours with the 2004 Homestore case, in which the Commission voted unanimously to file an amicus brief. [read post]