Search for: "Cal State L A" Results 241 - 260 of 1,777
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2021, 11:33 am by Sahara Pynes
Remember, state and local laws are changing rapidly, with face coverings now required indoors throughout the state and testing requirements for certain events, so please contact a member of our L&E team for the latest restrictions. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 11:33 am by Sahara Pynes
Remember, state and local laws are changing rapidly, with face coverings now required indoors throughout the state and testing requirements for certain events, so please contact a member of our L&E team for the latest restrictions. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm by admin
., that an individual will become ill or die within a stated period of time or by a certain age). [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
No state recognizes such a sweeping right of publicity that it is subject to zero countervailing First Amendment protections. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
I'll begin by laying out a few categories of situations where the risk of reputational harm is especially serious, and then summarize the state of court decisions on the subject. [1.] [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
I'm putting up some excerpts from my new draft article, The Law of Pseudonymous Litigation, hoping to get some feedback. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 2:07 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 Claim handlers continue to wrestle with enduring long-tail Exchange Act claims, federal and state Securities Act claims, and shareholder derivative suits without respite. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am by Eugene Volokh
And litigation of course deploys the coercive power of the state, even as it also accomplishes private goals. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
But that is a story for another day. [5] See, e.g., Cal. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am by Eugene Volokh
Say, for instance, that a wedding photographer has no First Amendment right to refuse to photograph a same-sex wedding in a state with a ban on sexual orientation discrimination by public accommodations. [read post]
Bay Area Air Quality Management District (2015) 62 Cal.4th 369, the court noted that CEQA requires a focus on the projects impact on the environment, not the environment’s impact on the project to conclude that petitioners had improperly framed the fair argument test. [read post]
Bay Area Air Quality Management District (2015) 62 Cal.4th 369, the court noted that CEQA requires a focus on the projects impact on the environment, not the environment’s impact on the project to conclude that petitioners had improperly framed the fair argument test. [read post]