Search for: "California v. Marks"
Results 241 - 260
of 4,354
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2023, 11:50 am
Committee to Relocate Marilyn v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:35 am
The case, Chason v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Katie Hobbs is seeking a review of what her office alleges was “likely unethical conduct” by the state’s former attorney general, Mark Brnovich. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:09 pm
(Heckman v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:31 pm
Superior Ct. of California for Riverside Cnty., 478 U.S. 1, 8 (1986). [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am
Mann, against National Review magazine, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, and Mark Steyn.[1] Back in 2014, I commented upon the oddity of a scientist’s claim of defamation against lay people for criticizing a scientist’s work.[2] Mann took umbrage to statements, critical of his work that generated a “hockey-stick” model of global temperature rises. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:09 am
"] March 14, 2023 - 10:30 AM [In-person]: Audemas Piquet Holding S.A. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
The first is from the California Attorney General in Rupp v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 9:55 am
In a 1992 Supreme Court decision, Dawson v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 5:59 am
PetConnect Rescue, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:28 am
By Mark S. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 4:00 pm
Distributed v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 5:45 pm
Seems right to me.Or, as Judge Bea puts it: "After a party obtains declaratory relief which decrees that it is not infringing a trademark, does it retain Article III standing to invalidate that mark? [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:33 pm
" But in Pistacchio v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:15 am
Sys. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 12:16 pm
Cariou v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Director Levenson was the consummate public servant who left an enduring mark on the Division of Corporation Finance, and the Commission more generally. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
., women’s clothing, costumes, and accessories,” filed suit in a California federal court against Fendi (an Italian fashion brand) and Marc Jacobs (an American fashion designer) alleging that the latter are selling goods which feature a logo that is “confusingly similar” to Roma’s registered mark. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Regents of the University of California (and later Grutter v. [read post]
