Search for: "Civil Procedure & Federal Courts Blog" Results 241 - 260 of 1,515
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
  The decision rested on the determination made by the District Court that those proposing the class could not satisfy the “predominance” requirement of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3). [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
By The Harman Firm, P.C.Last Updated: December 8, 2014- Rank this Week: 747 http://www.newyorkemploymentattorneysblog.com/New York Personal Injury Law Blog [Feed] Covers the civil justice system, New York Courts, injury law cases and news. [read post]
18 May 2021, 3:17 pm by Stan Gibson
(“Plaintiffs”) for May and June 2021 to proceed in-person, in San Francisco, California, instead take place remotely by videoconference under Rule 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure due to the continuing COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
27 May 2009, 5:30 am
  This procedural story began how most CAFA stories begin - plaintiffs filed suit in state court and defendants removed to federal court pursuant to CAFA. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:06 am by Rick St. Hilaire
But now the federal government's case is truly dead.Two weeks ago the court of appeals ruled against federal lawyers, halting their effort to forfeit the mummy mask on procedural grounds. [read post]
17 May 2021, 1:12 pm by Dennis Crouch
PerDiemCo LLC reads like my recent Civil Procedure final exam.[1]  The topic is personal jurisdiction–when may a Federal Court exercise its power over an out-of-state patentee in a declaratory judgment action challenging the patent’s validity. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 1:25 pm by Michael D. Thompson
Thus, when the issue arose in Picerni, the District Court considered whether a prohibition on private settlements for FLSA cases “runs afoul” of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 11:06 am by Allyson Ho and Scott Schutte
(Of course, when the Court examined Symczyk’s key assumption – that an unaccepted offer under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 mooted an individual claim – it rejected that assumption as well. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 5:51 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Cuevas Segarra’s Treatise on Civil Procedure, Supplemental Edition. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 11:18 am by Stan Gibson
“A court has broad discretion to determine an appropriate sanction under [Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (hereafter “FRCP”)] 37(b), […] which may include an order directing that certain designated facts be taken as true. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 7:21 am by Kevin LaCroix
               Criminal proceedings are often a substitute for civil proceedings In Switzerland, there are no discovery procedures comparable to discovery under U.S. federal rules of civil procedure. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 8:45 am by Unknown
"Reports & journal articles:25 Years of Immigration Court Decisions (TRAC, March 2023) [text]"Bringing 'Civil'ity into Immigration Law: Using the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to Fix Immigration Adjudication," Vanderbilt Law Review (Forthcoming) [preprint]Comments of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees on the Proposed Rule from the U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
   Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(c)(1)(A) states: “[a]t an early practicable time after a person sues or is sued as a class representative, the court must determine by order whether to certify the action as a class action. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:36 pm by Amy Howe
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in Georgia v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 5:56 pm
The blog learned earlier today that the petition, originally distributed for Friday’s conference, will in fact not be considered until a later conference. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:45 am by Beth Graham
Disputing has been a Featured Blog on Mediate.com since 2009. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:44 am by Victoria VanBuren
My opponent (Gibsons) has argued that the federal court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to decide if the arbitration clause is unconscionable (see its Pacer documents 12 & 13). [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 11:21 am by Christopher Bird
A major decision by the Court, and although lengthy it's very readable. - Christopher Bird, TorontoVisit our Toronto Law Firm website: www.wiselaw.net TORONTO EMPLOYMENT LAW • TORONTO CIVIL LITIGATION & ESTATE LITIGATION • TORONTO FAMILY LAW & DIVORCE ORIGINALLY POSTED AT WISE LAW BLOG • SUBSCRIBE TO WISE LAW BLOG [read post]