Search for: "Clark v. Wells" Results 241 - 260 of 1,830
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2011, 8:40 am by Cathyrn Hopkins, Olswang LLP
  As well as the allegedly tortuous exposure, Mrs Willmore was exposed to low-level, non-tortious, atmospheric asbestos. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:09 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Here are my prior posts on the Sackett case: Court to Consider Administrative Compliance Orders Sackett v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:25 am by Nexsen Pruet
The Colloquium marked the 60th anniversary of the trial Briggs v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 11:53 am
Lack of assessment of features 'commonplace' in current papercut works DJ Clarke outlined the correct approach to be used in comparing artistic works, as that of Lord Hoffman in Designers Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textile) Ltd. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Clark, June 18, 2015, 9-0 on the judgment, two dissenting votes on the main issue and one hard to classify vote. [read post]
  Nevertheless, the sole judgment of the Court (given by Lord Clarke) is admirably short and contains a useful statement of the existing principles, and so is well worth a read for commercial practitioners. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
He too considered Bonnard v Perryman and Reynolds v Malocco, as well as the hugely-influential decision of Clarke J in Cogley v RTE [2005] 4 IR 79, [2005] IEHC 180 (8 June 2005). [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 8:29 am by MARK GREAVES, MATRIX CHAMBERS
By contrast, as the Court of Appeal noted at para 42, in many of the leading cases the treatment in itself caused disadvantage: in Clark v Novacold Ltd [1999] ICR 951 the claimant was dismissed; in Lewisham London Borough Council v Malcolm [2008] UKHL the claim was evicted; and in Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] ICR 337 the claimant chief inspector had part of her duties as a manager removed. [read post]
Lord Reed, with whom Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale and Lord Clarke agreed, held that the scheme did fall foul of the principle of legality. [read post]