Search for: "Commonwealth v. Wells, D."
Results 241 - 260
of 456
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2014, 11:24 am
A well drafted publishing agreement can add value to a publishing company. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 10:42 am
You can see the e-mails here, and the judge’s decision here; I also quote the judge’s decision below: State v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 8:30 am
” 42 PA C S sec. 9799 In Coppolino v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 4:55 pm
Similarly, the High Court in Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) has recommended the development of the existing breach of confidence tort to better protect privacy invasions but this tort contains no explicit public interest defence (see discussion in D. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Since 1663, the Royal Society has sported the motto: “Nullius in verba,” on no one’s authority. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
I’m delighted to report that Michael Rosman and Michelle Scott of the Center for Individual Rights, Lisa Steele of AWARE (Arming Women Against Rape & Endangerment), and I have filed an amicus brief on behalf of AWARE in Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:43 pm
” Prosecutor v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 9:22 am
In Ray v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 8:00 am
LEXIS 92382, at **3-4 (D. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 8:05 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
It may well be foreseeable that competitors will mimic a product design or label. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
LEXIS 86993 (D. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
Gislaved Gummi AB, 178 F. 3d 257, 263–264 (4th Cir. 1999) (citing cases); Wells v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 11:54 am
Well, in Qdime Ltd v Various Leaseholders at Bath Building (Swindon) and others [2014] UKUT 261 (LC), the Upper Tribunal has given an unqualified endorsement of terrorism insurance and, in the process, may well have greatly extended the number of properties which are now required to obtain such insurance. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm
Some courts heroically resisted the pro-compensation Zeitgeist, usually on case-specific evidentiary issues.[8] In New York, judges seem to be well aware that post hoc ergo propter hoc is a fallacy. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014)Venkatesh Nayak, Programme Coordinator, Access to Information Programme, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative in New Delhi, has requested the circulation of the following essay, entitled "Promulgating Ordinances – Public Scrutiny and Judicial Review. [read post]
6 May 2014, 4:56 am
Dyer, 59 D. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:51 am
Patrick, No. 14-11689-RWZ, 2014 WL 1454696 (D. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Creedon and D. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 11:58 am
” Commonwealth v. [read post]
