Search for: "Cost v. Commonwealth" Results 241 - 260 of 670
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On 6 October 2023, the English Court of Appeal (Court of Appeal) handed down its judgment in Mints v PJSC National Bank Trust [2023] EWCA Civ 1132. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:48 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Court found by majority that s.12(1) of the State Immunity Act 1978 (the “SIA”) requires either: (i) an arbitration claim form, or (ii) the judge’s order giving permission to enforce the award to be served through the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (“FDCO”). [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 12:09 pm by Tom Cummings
PENNSYLVANIA COURT RULES THAT EMPLOYERS MUST REIMBURSE OUT-OF-POCKET COSTS FOR MEDICAL CANNABIS IN WORKERS COMPENSATION CASE On March 17, 2023, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court, in the companion cases of Appel v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 8:17 am by Chukwuma Okoli
The claimants/respondents claimed inter alia that under Awak custom, which was the personal law of the deceased person, they are legitimate heirs of his property, who died childless and intestate; a declaration that the distribution made on 22 August 2015 by the deceased’s family in accordance with Awak custom, giving an appreciable sum of the property to the defendant/appellant is fair and just; an order compelling the defendant/appellant to produce and hand over all the original title… [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 7:31 am by Florence Campbell Jones
Background The law on corporate criminal liability in England and Wales is one of the biggest obstacles to tackling economic crime, which the Treasury estimates costs the UK “tens” if not “hundreds of billions of pounds”[1]. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:30 am
Recently, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania issued a decision in the matter of CVA, Inc. and State Workers’ Insurance Fund v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 2:19 pm by David Jacobson
In F v Contract Service Provider to a Commonwealth Government Agency [2011] PrivCmrA 6 the Commissioner found that the collection of the complainant’s information by the CSP was necessary for a lawful purpose directly related to the CSPs functions or activities. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 11:54 am by J
On the “duty” point, it argued: (a)   there was a duty to insurance in line with the CML guidelines; (b)  those included “explosions” as a usual risk; (c)   that was, on its ordinary meaning, apt to include explosions caused by terrorism (with support derived from Commonwealth Smelting v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Benkharbouche v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs, heard 6-8 Jun 2017. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 1:42 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
Take for example the recent Alberta decisions in Ledcor Construction Limited v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Company. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 4:58 pm by Needle Law Firm
 State law concerning whether the employer’s workers’ compensation insurance carrier will reimburse travel costs to medical appointments has been greatly influenced by the Commonwealth Court decision of Helen Mining Co. v. [read post]