Search for: "Council v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 10,840
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2018, 1:29 pm
The post Federal Court of Appeal Quashes Order in Council Approving Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion in Tsleil-Waututh Nation v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 1:42 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council v Bainbridge & Ors [2007] EWCA Civ 910 (21 September 2007) High Court (Administrative Court) South Cambridgeshire District Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor [2007] EWHC 2117 (Admin) (18 September 2007) High Court (Chancery Division) Ross River Ltd & Anor v Cambridge City Football Club Ltd [2007] EWHC 2115 (Ch)… [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 7:23 am
The AG concluded that the Council cannot merely mention that a third State decision exists in its statement of reasons for a particular listing or extension. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 6:41 am
Chaney v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 9:09 am
This morning the First DCA issued its decision in 08-4713 COUNCIL FOR SECULAR HUMANSIM, INC., RICHARD HULL and ELAINE HULL, v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 3:00 pm
EOIR: Jurisdiction over Asylum Applications for Individuals Who Were in Expedited Removal Proceedings or Issued Notices to Appear: Practice Advisory (American Immigration Council, Dec. 2017) [text]"When Deportation is a Death Sentence," The New Yorker, 15 Jan. 2018 [text]Related posts:- Regional Focus: United States - Pt. 1 (16 Jan. 2018)- Regional Focus: United States (4 Jan. 2018)Tagged Publications. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 7:44 am
” Agri Processor Co. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 2:42 am
CAMPBELL (NCDOC#0063592), )Petitioners, ))v. ) 07 GOV 0238)NORTH CAROLINA COUNCIL OF STATE, )Respondent, ))JAMES EDWARD THOMAS and )MARCUS ROBINSON and )ARCHIE LEE BILLINGS, )Petitioners, )) 07 GOV 0264v. ))NORTH CAROLINA COUNCIL OF STATE, )Respondent )) DECISION [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 3:59 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Divsion) Bracknell Forest Borough Council v Green & Anor [2009] EWCA Civ 238 (20 March 2009) Lambert v Clayton [2009] EWCA Civ 237 (20 March 2009) High Court (Administrative Court) Bailey & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWHC 562 (Admin) (20 March 2009) Secretary of State for the Home Department v [...] [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 5:35 am
Tisdale v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 11:34 am
On June 2, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Bond v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 1:37 am
Vicoplus SC PUH v v Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid; BAM Vermeer Contracting sp. zoo v Same; Olbek Industrial Services sp. zoo v Same (Case C-307/09 to C-309/09); [2011] WLR (D) 46 “Articles 56FEU and 57FEU of the FEU Treaty did not preclude a member state from making the hiring out on its territory of workers who were Polish nationals subject to the obtaining of a work permit during the transitional period provided for in paragraph 2… [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:08 am
Sears v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 5:35 am
Continuing on, the court found that because LLC had not filed its application "in a court of this State," the implicit prohibition against initiating suits was irrelevant. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
On the question of which legal test to apply, the Court made it clear that while preemption under the Supremacy Clause (which provides that federal law generally trumps contrary state law) requires Congress to clearly state its intent to preempt state requirements, preemption under the Elections Clause is more easily found because federal elections law will always displace state law. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 3:47 am
TUPE The new consultation proposes to: Clarify the scope of TUPE to limit the provisions of TUPE to “employees” and to specifically state that workers do not fall within scope. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 2:42 am
Obviously, a significant feature of the above case is its impact on those persons who are in the position of relying upon the State for nursing home and post-retirement care - so seeing it in the context of work for older people (he is too modest to mention it, but Dr. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 11:04 am
Of course, under United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 8:00 am
State of Oregon v. [read post]
