Search for: "Cross v. Powers"
Results 241 - 260
of 4,823
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2018, 11:10 am
But the Supreme Court recently, in Munaf v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 10:56 am
Case citation: Lexmark International Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am
Buono, an Establishment Clause challenge to a cross in a public park on Establishment Clause grounds; and the oral argument in Doe v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court’s latest foray into this area is Merck v. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 7:14 am
Probable cause + vehicle = power to search. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 11:56 am
Gee and the cross-respondents in Gee v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:13 am
CROSS-POSTED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER PAYMENT The United States Supreme Court recently ruled in CIGNA Corp. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:58 am
In the civil context, the claim “accrues when the malpractice is committed” (Ruggiero v Powers, 284 AD2d 593, 594 [3d Dept 2001], lv dismissed 97 NY2d 638 [2001]), “not at the time that the injury is discovered” (Lavelle-Tomko v Aswad & Ingraham, 191 AD3d 1142, 1143 [3d Dept 2021]; see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002]). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm
Crossing to join his four liberal colleagues, Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the opinion in yesterday’s Davis v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 8:12 am
Facebook, Klayman v. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 12:11 am
The Indian Supreme Court in Modi Entertainment v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 5:27 pm
V. [read post]
2 May 2014, 8:19 am
Becker, The "Presumption of Impartiality" and other Errors in the International Criminal Court's Plenary Decision Concerning Judicial Disqualification of the President of the Court in The Prosecutor v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 9:10 am
Alpert v Villa Romano. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm
In 2004, the Supreme Court in Sosa v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 1:24 am
See Hawaii Insurers Council v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 2:30 am
New Judgment: Cape Intermediate Holdings Limited v Dring [2019] UKSC 38 On appeal from: [2018] EWCA Civ 1795 This appeal considered the powers of the court pursuant to the Civil Procedure Rules or its inherent jurisdiction to permit access to documents used in litigation to which the applicant was not a party. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 7:43 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:54 am
Most notably, in Parents Involved v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 12:55 pm
The Business Court yesterday sifted through cross motions for summary judgment brought by the seller and buyer of a business selling "power protection devices used primarily to control power surges and to provide power filtration in high volume office equipment. [read post]
