Search for: "Doe Nos." Results 241 - 260 of 2,055
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2021, 5:59 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Patent Nos. 7,076,624, 7,536,524, 8,234,477, and 9,361,243. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:34 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
     On Wednesday 15th December, the court will hand down judgment in the following cases:   In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Nos 1, 2 and 3)   In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for Judicial Review (Nos 1, 2 and 3)  In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Nos 1 and 2)  In the Appeal (1) The extent to which the article 2… [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 12:37 pm by Bill Marler
We just filed this motion to amend to add in JIMMY JOHN’s, LLC, an Illinois Limited Liability Company, INSPIRE BRANDS, INC., a Delaware corporation: This matter arises out of an outbreak of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) O103 that occurred in the early months of 2020. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As a threshold matter, respondent argues that the appeal must be dismissed because the November 2020 order does not constitute a final judgment (see CPLR 5701 [b] [1]; Matter of Alexander M. v Cleary, 188 AD3d 1471, 1473 [2020]; see also CPLR 5701 [a] [1]). [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As a threshold matter, respondent argues that the appeal must be dismissed because the November 2020 order does not constitute a final judgment (see CPLR 5701 [b] [1]; Matter of Alexander M. v Cleary, 188 AD3d 1471, 1473 [2020]; see also CPLR 5701 [a] [1]). [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:42 pm
The Court noted that the speedy trial guarantee does not apply to pre-indictment delay (here, Shulick alleged two years of preindictment delay). [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 2:20 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
In May 2014, the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) issued the requested Principal Register registrations—Nos. 4,524,540 and 4,532,073—under Lanham Act § 1(a), 15 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 12:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Court was asked to decide on the following question: To have capacity to decide to have sexual relations with another person, does a person need to understand that the other person must have the capacity to consent to the sexual activity and must in fact consent before and throughout the sexual activity? [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 5:30 am by Kevin
” (It probably used a much larger and more ornate font for the NOs originally, but Westlaw just put them in capital letters.) [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 3:40 am
In re Snap Inc., Serial Nos. 87177292 and 87211997 (November 3, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 12:06 pm by Gregory B. Williams
Patent Nos. 6,851,115 (“the ‘115 patent”) and 7,069,560 (“the ‘560 patent”) after finding that Plaintiff has no evidence of every limitation of the asserted claims being present in Alexa because Alexa does not meet the required ICL service request limitation found in the asserted claims of the patents-in-suit. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 12:06 pm by Gregory B. Williams
Patent Nos. 6,851,115 (“the ‘115 patent”) and 7,069,560 (“the ‘560 patent”) after finding that Plaintiff has no evidence of every limitation of the asserted claims being present in Alexa because Alexa does not meet the required ICL service request limitation found in the asserted claims of the patents-in-suit. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 8:53 pm by Florian Mueller
It also points out that most of the companies targeted by Nokia with patent assertions don't countersue, but OPPO does have a very significant 5G patent portfolio of its own.As a follow-up to my list of Western European Nokia v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 11:42 am by Sara Alexis Levine Abarbanel
It does not state whether or not the expansion of the law as to separation agreements is retroactive or a date when it is effective. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 9:40 am by Dennis Crouch
Patent Nos. 8,977,284 (“the ’284 patent”), 9,510,320 (“the ’320 patent”), 9,642,024 (“the ’024 patent”), and 9,549,388. [read post]