Search for: "Doe v. ATTORNEY" Results 241 - 260 of 36,709
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2023, 7:48 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Wyner, 551 U.S. 74 (2007), which holds that "transient" preliminary injunction rulings reached after an expedited process does not permit an award of attorneys' fees. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 11:36 am by Dennis Crouch
Their prime example is that §145 does not say “attorney fees” while a parallel provision for infringement litigation, §285 does expressly say “attorney fees. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 11:09 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Defendants will almost certainly argue that plaintiff should get nothing in attorneys' fees.The case is Knights v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 4:48 pm
Amurao, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, bringing to that Court's attention the issue of whether a defendant should be entitled to his attorneys fees where the RIAA has voluntarily dismissed the case, after first causing the defendant to incur significant expense.The brief points to two recent decisions of the Seventh Circuit, which held that the fact that defendant's victory was achieved by virtue of the plaintiffs' having "thrown in the… [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 9:32 am by Michael Lowe
Texas does is allow the police (or FBI or Texas Rangers, etc.) and the district attorney (or US Attorney or prosecutor) to use your silence against you at trial, assuming that they arrest and charge you with the crime. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 10:46 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
I wanted to comment at least briefly, or more accurately thematically, on the Third Circuit’s decision last week in Santomenno v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 4:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 New York Law Under New York law, the attorney-client privilege regarding pre-merger communications between an attorney and his or her client which are related to a business/corporate merger does not fully pass to the new or surviving company/buyer, but remains with the former shareholders of the prior company/seller (see Tekni-Plex, Inc. v Meyner & Landis, 89 NY2d at 130). [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 1:58 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Awards for attorney's fees, and contract law generally, are topics in the case Buckhorn v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:00 am by autumn
 This holding is in line with the 3rd DCA, but does conflict with other courts. [read post]
14 May 2010, 5:41 am by Ted Frank
The attorneys in the case of Bachmann v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 3:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
DelBello does not dispute that it employed Pasternak or that Pasternak was acting within the scope of his employment (see Riviello v Waldron, 47 NY2d 297, 302 [1979]). [read post]