Search for: "Does, 1-20"
Results 241 - 260
of 27,632
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2017, 8:14 am
Regarding the amount in disperse phase (b), the upper limits of the ranges defined in claim 1 (5-50 wt%) and claim 3 (9-20 wt%) of D1 could be combined to generate a preferred range of 20-50 wt% that completely contained the range of 20-40 wt% according to claim 1 of the patent in suit. [read post]
15 May 2018, 3:48 pm
Rptr. 3d 18, 20 (Ct. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 12:01 pm
The Board found this claim not to comply with A 123(2):[2.1] The feature of claim 1 “wherein said stretching members (5) extend in said contacting portion (20), in the vicinity of the fold and in said standing portion (10), respectively;” (specified as “feature (iii)” in the following text) results, in particular with regard to the wording “in the vicinity of the fold”, in subject-matter which does not meet the requirement of A 123(2).… [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
The rule is discussed in Exchange Act Release No. 67220 (June 20, 2012). [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
Claim 1 of the patent as maintained by the Examining Division read (in English translation; the amendments with respect to the claim as granted are underlined):Method for manufacturing a clutch cage of a double clutch (1), characterized by the following method steps:rolling a toothing system (20) into a sheet metal strip (21 ) by means of two rolls (28,29) arranged on both sides of the sheet metal strip (21), wherein the two rolls (28, 29) have an outer contour… [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 6:00 am
§705(20), [§504] differ from the definition of “disability” for the purposes of claims advanced pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:30 am
Unidentified Parties - Does 1-20The Accused Infringers last sought dismissal of the 20 parties identified only as Does 1-20. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:30 am
Unidentified Parties - Does 1-20The Accused Infringers last sought dismissal of the 20 parties identified only as Does 1-20. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 10:47 am
What Does This Mean for My Company? [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 9:27 am
For reasons the Circuit opinion does not fully explain, Ms. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 2:46 pm
Feb. 20, 2019). [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
The defendants then argued that spouses should be included in assessing CAFA’s numerosity requirement based on the Louisiana’s community property regime – Louisiana Civil Law Treaties: Matrimonial Regimes § 1:1 (3d ed. 2013). [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:13 am
Praxair Distribution, Inc. et al, 1-15-cv-00170 (DED September 5, 2017, Order) (Sleet, USDJ) [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:18 am
The prescription was for 1 pint of whiskey. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:33 am
In North Carolina, does a private meeting with one appraiser constitute fraud? [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 8:01 am
Beshear, 20-6341 (6th Cir. [read post]
15 May 2021, 8:40 pm
The webinar will present two panel discussions with speakers from Alibaba, Johnson Controls, AkzoNobel, and Ferrero: • Panel 1: IP strategy—does one size fit all? [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 2:36 pm
Workers there have an average commute time of less than 20 minutes and work less than 37 hours per week on average. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 3:30 am
”1 I know the rules may differ depending... . [read post]
