Search for: "Does 1 - 38" Results 241 - 260 of 4,911
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2012, 1:11 pm by Dennis Crouch
Over the past year, the USPTO OED has issued 38 Disciplinary Orders. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This decision also contains an interesting application of A 123(3): [18] Claim 37 (and claims 38 to 40 dependent thereon) of the application as published refer to a kit for parenteral administration of a liquid interferon formulation. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 12:36 pm by David Markus
Because the panel does not read Title VII to fulfill that promise, Irespectfully dissent.The 2-1 decision is authored by District Judge Jose Martinez and joined by William Pryor (who also writes a concurring opinion). [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 1:34 pm by Gene Killian
The house burned down, and Pacific refused to pay more than 38% of $14,388,000, or approximately $5.5 million. [read post]
21 Jan 2017, 2:11 pm
The speech does not start, as is customary, with a polite nod in the direction of the predecessor president, and some expression of gratitude to the masses who made his presence on that dais possible. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 8:59 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Therefore, allowing administrative tribunals to decide Charter issues does not undermine the role of the courts as final arbiters of constitutionality in Canada. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:31 pm by Daniel Shaviro
 Now, by express hypothesis, ED-Co has $200 of pretax earnings in the UK, on which it is paying $38 of UK tax,  So it owes the US $38 pre-credit, minus $38 of foreign tax credits, with the result that it actually pays the US zero.In this scenario, what has the 19% minimum tax accomplished? [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 10:14 am
Nationals of those countries enjoy visa-free entry into the US, but that does not mean no screening. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 11:18 pm by Prashant Reddy
Interestingly, while the Copyright Act fails to clarify what construes to be “commercial use”, the explanations to Rule 68 of the Copyright Rules, 2013 clarify three things:1)  The royalty collected from enjoyment of the performer’s right in (i) to (v) of clause (a) of sub section (1) and proviso to sub. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 7:20 am by Steve Delchin
  The panel concluded its opinion by making clear that Rule 38 does “not permit a lawyer, ostrich-like, to continue prosecuting a case while refusing to recognize the relevant legal standard or counter the opposing party’s factual arguments. [read post]