Search for: "Does 1-194"
Results 241 - 260
of 683
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2017, 12:06 am
The ground of opposition was that the mark was not registerable in that: 1. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:38 am
’” In the Matter of 1-800 Contacts, Inc., Docket No. 9372, 124 F.T.C. 194 (2017) (quoting Realcomp II, Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 9:43 am
What does it take? [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 9:43 am
What does it take? [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 10:45 am
Under the FEHA, an adverse employment action must be reasonably likely to impair an employee’s job performance or prospects for advances.[1] It does not include minor or trivial actions that do no more than anger or upset an employee. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 11:28 am
The Patent Office has several procedures to determine whether an issued patent was improperly granted to a party that does not meet the legal standard for patentability of an invention. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 1:46 pm
Session Law 2017-194 made numerous changes to North Carolina’s gang suppression laws. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
, 438 S.W.3d 1, 3-4 (Tex. 2014). [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
, 438 S.W.3d 1, 3-4 (Tex. 2014). [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:12 am
However, the purchase does provide a clear example of a ‘success’ story in terms of the UK retaining a work of outstanding national importance whilst balancing all of the relevant parties’ rights. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:12 am
However, the purchase does provide a clear example of a ‘success’ story in terms of the UK retaining a work of outstanding national importance whilst balancing all of the relevant parties’ rights. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:12 am
However, the purchase does provide a clear example of a ‘success’ story in terms of the UK retaining a work of outstanding national importance whilst balancing all of the relevant parties’ rights. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:12 am
However, the purchase does provide a clear example of a ‘success’ story in terms of the UK retaining a work of outstanding national importance whilst balancing all of the relevant parties’ rights. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 8:01 pm
App. 194 (1971). [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
––––, 136 S.Ct. 1540, 1547, 194 L.Ed.2d 635 (2016). [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:17 am
2C:16-1. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:00 am
Rideout, 2000 ME 194, 761 A.2d 288. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:21 pm
Oral Arg. at54:45, 1:02:00. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 10:14 am
City of Santa Clara (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 1150, 1170.) [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 10:14 am
City of Santa Clara (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 1150, 1170.) [read post]
