Search for: "Does 1-22" Results 241 - 260 of 15,024
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2024, 10:12 am by Arthur F. Coon
” ”  The Court of Appeal thus focused its attention on appellant’s two primary arguments:  that no substantial evidence supported the City’s findings (1) that the project site had no habitat value for endangered, rare or threatened species, and (2) that the project would not have significant air quality impacts. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:56 am by Katharina Schmid (schmid-ip)
That a term refers to a historical fact does not necessarily mean that only the older generations are aware of its meaning, especially among a specialist public (para 64). [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:56 am by Katharina Schmid (schmid-ip)
That a term refers to a historical fact does not necessarily mean that only the older generations are aware of its meaning, especially among a specialist public (para 64). [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:32 am by Josh Blackman
"); see also id., at 71, n. 1 (Granfinanciera "can be read as overruling or severely limiting" Atlas Roofing). [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
The Press Gazette explains why this does not augur well for a rapid resolution to the AI/IP problem. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 2:29 am by Marcel Pemsel
Could this alignment be considered ‘assembly’, taking into account that Art. 110(1) CDR does not require a strict interpretation (Acacia at para. 41)? [read post]
20 Jul 2024, 12:00 am
A first-time Class 1 misdemeanor DUI conviction requires spending time in county jail up to a maximum of six months and a minimum of 10 days. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 1:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
On or about April 22, 2019, Liang sent NEAPUC's logo to PRC Official 1 and sent the logo as well as the incorporation documents to PRC Official 5. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:07 pm by Katitza Rodriguez
For example, paragraph 22 sets a high bar of ”substantial grounds for believing” for the requested State to refuse assistance. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:51 am by Dan Bressler
A judge must not allow family, social, political or other relationships to influence the judge’s judicial conduct or judgment (see 22 NYCRR 100.2[B]) and must disqualify in a proceeding where the judge’s impartiality “might reasonably be questioned” (22 NYCRR 100.3[E][1]). [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 1:03 am by Rose Hughes
 When determining the patentability of a product and/or its use, key questions are therefore: 1) Is the claimed product known? [read post]